Literature DB >> 19084581

Delay of gratification by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in working and waiting situations.

Michael J Beran1, Theodore A Evans.   

Abstract

We tested four chimpanzees in a self-control task in which food rewards accumulated as long as they were not eaten. In one condition, the chimpanzees had to perform a computer task that directly led to the delivery of the food rewards. In another condition, working on the computerized task was not required and any such work was not linked to the delivery of rewards. The third condition offered no computerized task (chimpanzees simply waited for food rewards to be delivered). Three of four chimpanzees showed no effect of the work scenario on delay of gratification. The one chimpanzee that showed an influence of work scenario on self-control was the overall poorest performing animal. This animal delayed gratification the longest, however, when work was required and reward delivery was directly linked to that work. Therefore, although there is little evidence linking delay of gratification to work requirements in chimpanzees, chimpanzees with lower overall self-control might benefit from having some work available if reward accumulation is contingent on performing that work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19084581      PMCID: PMC2649723          DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  16 in total

1.  "Work ethic" in pigeons: reward value is directly related to the effort or time required to obtain the reward.

Authors:  T S Clement; J R Feltus; D H Kaiser; T R Zentall
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

2.  Strategic attention deployment for delay of gratification in working and waiting situations.

Authors:  Philip K Peake; Walter Mischel; Michelle Hebl
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2002-03

Review 3.  Delay of gratification in children.

Authors:  W Mischel; Y Shoda; M I Rodriguez
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Maintenance of delay of gratification by four chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): the effects of delayed reward visibility, experimenter presence, and extended delay intervals.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Theodore A Evans
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Self-control in pigeons under the Mischel paradigm.

Authors:  J Grosch; A Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Maintenance of self-imposed delay of gratification by four chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and an orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus).

Authors:  Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  2002-01

7.  Delay of gratification in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  M J Beran; E S Savage-Rumbaugh; J L Pate; D M Rumbaugh
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.038

8.  Will travel for food: spatial discounting in two new world monkeys.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Stevens; Alexandra G Rosati; Kathryn R Ross; Marc D Hauser
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Chimpanzees use self-distraction to cope with impulsivity.

Authors:  Theodore A Evans; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Delay of gratification and delay maintenance by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Theodore A Evans; Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  2007-04
View more
  13 in total

1.  Trace conditioning as a test for animal consciousness: a new approach.

Authors:  Paula Droege; Daniel J Weiss; Natalie Schwob; Victoria Braithwaite
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Social inhibitory control in five lemur species.

Authors:  Rachna B Reddy; Evan L MacLean; Aaron A Sandel; Brian Hare
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.163

Review 3.  How does cognition shape social relationships?

Authors:  Claudia A F Wascher; Ipek G Kulahci; Ellis J G Langley; Rachael C Shaw
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Time discounting and time preference in animals: A critical review.

Authors:  Benjamin Y Hayden
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

5.  Working and waiting for better rewards: self-control in two monkey species (Cebus apella and Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Theodore A Evans; Bonnie M Perdue; Audrey E Parrish; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  The hybrid delay task: can capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) sustain a delay after an initial choice to do so?

Authors:  Fabio Paglieri; Valentina Focaroli; Jessica Bramlett; Valeria Tierno; Joseph M McIntyre; Elsa Addessi; Theodore A Evans; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Chimpanzees can point to smaller amounts of food to accumulate larger amounts but they still fail the reverse-reward contingency task.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Brielle T James; Will Whitham; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 2.478

8.  Deciding when to "cash in" when outcomes are continuously improving: an escalating interest task.

Authors:  Michael E Young; Tara L Webb; Eric A Jacobs
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) transfer tokens repeatedly with a partner to accumulate rewards in a self-control task.

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Bonnie M Perdue; Theodore A Evans; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Waiting for better, not for more: corvids respond to quality in two delay maintenance tasks.

Authors:  Friederike Hillemann; Thomas Bugnyar; Kurt Kotrschal; Claudia A F Wascher
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.844

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.