Literature DB >> 16243033

Will travel for food: spatial discounting in two new world monkeys.

Jeffrey R Stevens1, Alexandra G Rosati, Kathryn R Ross, Marc D Hauser.   

Abstract

Nonhuman animals steeply discount the future, showing a preference for small, immediate over large, delayed rewards. Currently unclear is whether discounting functions depend on context. Here, we examine the effects of spatial context on discounting in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) and common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), species known to differ in temporal discounting. We presented subjects with a choice between small, nearby rewards and large, distant rewards. Tamarins traveled farther for the large reward than marmosets, attending to the ratio of reward differences rather than their absolute values. This species difference contrasts with performance on a temporal task in which marmosets waited longer than tamarins for the large reward. These comparative data indicate that context influences choice behavior, with the strongest effect seen in marmosets who discounted more steeply over space than over time. These findings parallel details of each species' feeding ecology. Tamarins range over large distances and feed primarily on insects, which requires using quick, impulsive action. Marmosets range over shorter distances than tamarins and feed primarily on tree exudates, a clumped resource that requires patience to wait for sap to exude. These results show that discounting functions are context specific, shaped by a history of ecological pressures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16243033      PMCID: PMC8049090          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  17 in total

1.  To walk or to fly? How birds choose among foraging modes.

Authors:  L M Bautista; J Tinbergen; A Kacelnik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Effects of reinforcer magnitude on an animal model of impulsive behavior.

Authors:  Andrew M. Farrar; Artur K. Kieres; Kathryn A. Hausknecht; Harriet de Wit; Jerry B. Richards
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Discounting of delayed food rewards in pigeons and rats: is there a magnitude effect?

Authors:  Leonard Green; Joel Myerson; Daniel D Holt; John R Slevin; Sara J Estle
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 4.  Delay of gratification in children.

Authors:  W Mischel; Y Shoda; M I Rodriguez
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease as amounts increase.

Authors:  K N Kirby; N N Maraković
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-03

6.  Determination of discount functions in rats with an adjusting-amount procedure.

Authors:  J B Richards; S H Mitchell; H de Wit; L S Seiden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Measuring state changes in human delay discounting: an experiential discounting task.

Authors:  Brady Reynolds; Ryan Schiffbauer
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  The pharmacology of impulsive behaviour in rats: the effects of drugs on response choice with varying delays of reinforcement.

Authors:  J L Evenden; C N Ryan
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Experimental evidence for spatial memory in foraging wild capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Social implications of gummivory in marmosets.

Authors:  M L Harrison; S D Tardif
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.868

View more
  58 in total

1.  A fruit in hand is worth many more in the bush: steep spatial discounting by free-ranging rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Jerald D Kralik; William W L Sampson
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 2.  Calculating utility: preclinical evidence for cost-benefit analysis by mesolimbic dopamine.

Authors:  Paul E M Phillips; Mark E Walton; Thomas C Jhou
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Trace conditioning as a test for animal consciousness: a new approach.

Authors:  Paula Droege; Daniel J Weiss; Natalie Schwob; Victoria Braithwaite
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Neurons in the nucleus accumbens promote selection bias for nearer objects.

Authors:  Sara E Morrison; Saleem M Nicola
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Social inhibitory control in five lemur species.

Authors:  Rachna B Reddy; Evan L MacLean; Aaron A Sandel; Brian Hare
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.163

6.  The effect of 5-HT1A receptor antagonist on reward-based decision-making.

Authors:  Fumika Akizawa; Takashi Mizuhiki; Tsuyoshi Setogawa; Mai Takafuji; Munetaka Shidara
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 2.781

7.  Limited encoding of effort by dopamine neurons in a cost-benefit trade-off task.

Authors:  Benjamin Pasquereau; Robert S Turner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Working and waiting for better rewards: self-control in two monkey species (Cebus apella and Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Theodore A Evans; Bonnie M Perdue; Audrey E Parrish; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Chimpanzees use self-distraction to cope with impulsivity.

Authors:  Theodore A Evans; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Choosing to make an effort: the role of striatum in signaling physical effort of a chosen action.

Authors:  I T Kurniawan; B Seymour; D Talmi; W Yoshida; N Chater; R J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.