Literature DB >> 10780022

"Work ethic" in pigeons: reward value is directly related to the effort or time required to obtain the reward.

T S Clement1, J R Feltus, D H Kaiser, T R Zentall.   

Abstract

Stimuli associated with less effort or with shorter delays to reinforcement are generally preferred over those associated with greater effort or longer delays to reinforcement. However, the opposite appears to be true of stimuli that follow greater effort or longer delays. In training, a simple simultaneous discrimination followed a single peck to an initial stimulus (S+FR1 S-FR1) and a different simple simultaneous discrimination followed 20 pecks to the initial stimulus (S+FR20 S-FR20). On test trials, pigeons preferred S+FR20 over S+FR1 and S-FR20 over S-FR1. These data support the view that the state of the animal immediately prior to presentation of the discrimination affects the value of the reinforcement that follows it. This contrast effect is analogous to effects that when they occur in humans have been attributed to more complex cognitive and social factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10780022     DOI: 10.3758/bf03210727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  14 in total

1.  Discriminability and the contrafreeloading phenomenon.

Authors:  G T Taylor
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1975-01

2.  Preference for bar pressing over "freeloading" as a function of number of rewarded presses.

Authors:  G D JENSEN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1963-05

3.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 4.  Learned industriousness.

Authors:  R Eisenberger
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  The following schedule of reinforcement as a fundamental determinant of steady state contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 6.  Detrimental effects of reward. Reality or myth?

Authors:  R Eisenberger; J Cameron
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1996-11

Review 7.  Arousal, learning, and memory.

Authors:  M W Eysenck
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  An equation for behavioral contrast.

Authors:  B A Williams; J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Backward conditioning: a reevaluation of the empirical evidence.

Authors:  M L Spetch; D M Wilkie; J P Pinel
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Rats' preference for earned in comparison with free food.

Authors:  B Carder; K Berkowitz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-02-27       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  52 in total

1.  Examination of the influence of contingency on changes in reinforcer value.

Authors:  Iser G DeLeon; Meagan K Gregory; Michelle A Frank-Crawford; Melissa J Allman; Arthur E Wilke; Abbey B Carreau-Webster; Mandy M Triggs
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2011

2.  Greater effort boosts the affective taste properties of food.

Authors:  Alexander W Johnson; Michela Gallagher
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Opponency revisited: competition and cooperation between dopamine and serotonin.

Authors:  Y-Lan Boureau; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Discriminative stimuli that follow a delay have added value for pigeons.

Authors:  Kelly A DiGian; Andrea M Friedrich; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

5.  Influence of temporal context on value in the multiple-chains and successive-encounters procedures.

Authors:  Matthew O'Daly; Samuel Angulo; Cassandra Gipson; Edmund Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The influence of prior choices on current choice.

Authors:  Xochitl de la Piedad; Douglas Field; Howard Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Discriminative stimuli that follow the absence of reinforcement are preferred by pigeons over those that follow reinforcement.

Authors:  Andrea M Friedrich; Tricia S Clement; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  When is a failure to replicate not a type II error?

Authors:  Marco Vasconcelos; Peter J Urcuioli; Karen M Lionello-DeNolf
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Within-trial contrast: when is a failure to replicate not a type I error?

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Rebecca A Singer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Within-trial contrast: The effect of probability of reinforcement in training.

Authors:  Cassandra D Gipson; Holly C Miller; Jérôme J D Alessandri; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 1.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.