Literature DB >> 19074438

GroEL Recognizes an Amphipathic Helix and Binds to the Hydrophobic Side.

Yali Li1, Xinfeng Gao, Lingling Chen.   

Abstract

GroEL is an essential Escherichia coli molecular chaperon that uses ATP to facilitate correct folding of a range of proteins in a cell. Central to the GroEL substrate diversity is how GroEL recognizes the substrates. The interaction between GroEL and substrate has been proposed to be largely hydrophobic because GroEL interacts with proteins in non-native conformations but not in native forms. Analysis of GroEL substrate proteins reveals that one of its main substrates are proteins with alphabeta folding domains, suggesting that GroEL may stabilize the collapsed alphabeta core by binding to hydrophobic surfaces that are usually buried between the alpha and beta elements. In this study, we characterize the interaction between GroEL and a peptide derived from our previous selection via a phage display method. NMR studies map the peptide-binding site to the region containing Helices H and I, which is consistent with evidence that this region comprises the primary substrate-binding site. The peptide is largely unstructured in solution but adopts a helical conformation when bound to the GroEL apical domain with a moderate affinity (K(d) = 17.1 +/- 2.5 microm). The helical conformation aligns residues to form an amphipathic structure, and the hydrophobic side of this amphipathic helix interacts with GroEL as suggested by fluorescence quenching studies. Together with previous structural studies on the GroEL-peptide complexes, our work supports the notion that the amphipathic secondary elements in the substrate proteins may be the structural motif recognized by GroEL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19074438      PMCID: PMC2640968          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M804818200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  40 in total

1.  Basis of substrate binding by the chaperonin GroEL.

Authors:  Z Wang; H p Feng; S J Landry; J Maxwell; L M Gierasch
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  The crystal structure of a GroEL/peptide complex: plasticity as a basis for substrate diversity.

Authors:  L Chen; P B Sigler
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-12-23       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Chaperonin-mediated protein folding.

Authors:  D Thirumalai; G H Lorimer
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2001

4.  Different conformations for the same polypeptide bound to chaperones DnaK and GroEL.

Authors:  S J Landry; R Jordan; R McMacken; L M Gierasch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Conformational variability in the refined structure of the chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 A resolution.

Authors:  K Braig; P D Adams; A T Brünger
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1995-12

6.  Use of a water flip-back pulse in the homonuclear NOESY experiment.

Authors:  G Lippens; C Dhalluin; J M Wieruszeski
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  Chaperonin-mediated protein folding at the surface of groEL through a 'molten globule'-like intermediate.

Authors:  J Martin; T Langer; R Boteva; A Schramel; A L Horwich; F U Hartl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-04       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  The two-dimensional transferred nuclear Overhauser effect: theory and practice.

Authors:  A P Campbell; B D Sykes
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  1993

9.  Secondary structure forming propensity coupled with amphiphilicity is an optimal motif in a peptide or protein for association with chaperonin 60 (GroEL).

Authors:  M Preuss; J P Hutchinson; A D Miller
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-08-10       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Structure of the heat shock protein chaperonin-10 of Mycobacterium leprae.

Authors:  S C Mande; V Mehra; B R Bloom; W G Hol
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-01-12       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  16 in total

1.  Structural basis for the unfolding of anthrax lethal factor by protective antigen oligomers.

Authors:  Geoffrey K Feld; Katie L Thoren; Alexander F Kintzer; Harry J Sterling; Iok I Tang; Shoshana G Greenberg; Evan R Williams; Bryan A Krantz
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 15.369

2.  Structural and functional conservation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis GroEL paralogs suggests that GroEL1 Is a chaperonin.

Authors:  Bernhard Sielaff; Ki Seog Lee; Francis T F Tsai
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Probing the transient dark state of substrate binding to GroEL by relaxation-based solution NMR.

Authors:  David S Libich; Nicolas L Fawzi; Jinfa Ying; G Marius Clore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Reconciling theories of chaperonin accelerated folding with experimental evidence.

Authors:  Andrew I Jewett; Joan-Emma Shea
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  Single-molecule observation of protein folding in symmetric GroEL-(GroES)2 complexes.

Authors:  Yodai Takei; Ryo Iizuka; Taro Ueno; Takashi Funatsu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Increased surface charge in the protein chaperone Spy enhances its anti-aggregation activity.

Authors:  Wei He; Jiayin Zhang; Veronika Sachsenhauser; Lili Wang; James C A Bardwell; Shu Quan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Group II archaeal chaperonin recognition of partially folded human γD-crystallin mutants.

Authors:  Oksana A Sergeeva; Jingkun Yang; Jonathan A King; Kelly M Knee
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 8.  Inorganic polyphosphate, a multifunctional polyanionic protein scaffold.

Authors:  Lihan Xie; Ursula Jakob
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Heterozygous yeast deletion collection screens reveal essential targets of Hsp90.

Authors:  Eric A Franzosa; Véronique Albanèse; Judith Frydman; Yu Xia; Amie J McClellan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Forces Driving Chaperone Action.

Authors:  Philipp Koldewey; Frederick Stull; Scott Horowitz; Raoul Martin; James C A Bardwell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 41.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.