Literature DB >> 23798407

Probing the transient dark state of substrate binding to GroEL by relaxation-based solution NMR.

David S Libich1, Nicolas L Fawzi, Jinfa Ying, G Marius Clore.   

Abstract

The mechanism whereby the prototypical chaperonin GroEL performs work on substrate proteins has not yet been fully elucidated, hindered by lack of detailed structural and dynamic information on the bound substrate. Previous investigations have produced conflicting reports on the state of GroEL-bound polypeptides, largely due to the transient and dynamic nature of these complexes. Here, we present a unique approach, based on combined analysis of four complementary relaxation-based NMR experiments, to probe directly the "dark" NMR-invisible state of the model, intrinsically disordered, polypeptide amyloid β (Aβ40) bound to GroEL. The four NMR experiments, lifetime line-broadening, dark-state exchange saturation transfer, relaxation dispersion, and small exchange-induced chemical shifts, are dependent in different ways on the overall exchange rates and populations of the free and bound states of the substrate, as well as on residue-specific dynamics and structure within the bound state as reported by transverse magnetization relaxation rates and backbone chemical shifts, respectively. Global fitting of all the NMR data shows that the complex is transient with a lifetime of <1 ms, that binding involves two predominantly hydrophobic segments corresponding to predicted GroEL consensus binding sequences, and that the structure of the bound polypeptide remains intrinsically and dynamically disordered with minimal changes in secondary structure propensity relative to the free state. Our results establish a unique method to observe NMR-invisible dynamic states of GroEL-bound substrates and to describe at atomic resolution the events between substrate binding and encapsulation that are crucial for understanding the normal and stress-related metabolic function of chaperonins.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conformational sampling; protein–protein interactions; supramolecular machine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23798407      PMCID: PMC3710837          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1305715110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  37 in total

1.  Chaperonin function: folding by forced unfolding.

Authors:  M Shtilerman; G H Lorimer; S W Englander
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-04-30       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Different conformations for the same polypeptide bound to chaperones DnaK and GroEL.

Authors:  S J Landry; R Jordan; R McMacken; L M Gierasch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Direct NMR observation of a substrate protein bound to the chaperonin GroEL.

Authors:  Reto Horst; Eric B Bertelsen; Jocelyne Fiaux; Gerhard Wider; Arthur L Horwich; Kurt Wüthrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Residues in substrate proteins that interact with GroEL in the capture process are buried in the native state.

Authors:  George Stan; Bernard R Brooks; George H Lorimer; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Probing invisible, low-populated States of protein molecules by relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy: an application to protein folding.

Authors:  Dmitry M Korzhnev; Lewis E Kay
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 22.384

Review 6.  Chaperone machines in action.

Authors:  Helen R Saibil
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  Multiple tight phospholipid-binding modes of alpha-synuclein revealed by solution NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Christina R Bodner; Christopher M Dobson; Ad Bax
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  GroEL Recognizes an Amphipathic Helix and Binds to the Hydrophobic Side.

Authors:  Yali Li; Xinfeng Gao; Lingling Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Criteria for assessing the purity and quality of GroEL.

Authors:  M J Todd; G H Lorimer
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.600

10.  Topologies of a substrate protein bound to the chaperonin GroEL.

Authors:  Nadav Elad; George W Farr; Daniel K Clare; Elena V Orlova; Arthur L Horwich; Helen R Saibil
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 17.970

View more
  33 in total

1.  Probing the mechanism of inhibition of amyloid-β(1-42)-induced neurotoxicity by the chaperonin GroEL.

Authors:  Marielle A Wälti; Joseph Steiner; Fanjie Meng; Hoi Sung Chung; John M Louis; Rodolfo Ghirlando; Vitali Tugarinov; Avindra Nath; G Marius Clore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Role of denatured-state properties in chaperonin action probed by single-molecule spectroscopy.

Authors:  Hagen Hofmann; Frank Hillger; Cyrille Delley; Armin Hoffmann; Shawn H Pfeil; Daniel Nettels; Everett A Lipman; Benjamin Schuler
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Intrinsic unfoldase/foldase activity of the chaperonin GroEL directly demonstrated using multinuclear relaxation-based NMR.

Authors:  David S Libich; Vitali Tugarinov; G Marius Clore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Subunit conformational variation within individual GroEL oligomers resolved by Cryo-EM.

Authors:  Soung-Hun Roh; Corey F Hryc; Hyun-Hwan Jeong; Xue Fei; Joanita Jakana; George H Lorimer; Wah Chiu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Chaperonin GroEL accelerates protofibril formation and decorates fibrils of the Het-s prion protein.

Authors:  Marielle A Wälti; Thomas Schmidt; Dylan T Murray; Huaibin Wang; Jenny E Hinshaw; G Marius Clore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Probing conformational dynamics in biomolecules via chemical exchange saturation transfer: a primer.

Authors:  Pramodh Vallurupalli; Ashok Sekhar; Tairan Yuwen; Lewis E Kay
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2017-03-19       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  Decorrelating Kinetic and Relaxation Parameters in Exchange Saturation Transfer NMR: A Case Study of N-Terminal Huntingtin Peptides Binding to Unilamellar Lipid Vesicles.

Authors:  Alberto Ceccon; G Marius Clore; Vitali Tugarinov
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 8.  Recent excitements in protein NMR: Large proteins and biologically relevant dynamics.

Authors:  Sai Chaitanya Chiliveri; Mandar V Deshmukh
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Protein Interactions with Nanoparticle Surfaces: Highlighting Solution NMR Techniques.

Authors:  Y Randika Perera; Rebecca A Hill; Nicholas C Fitzkee
Journal:  Isr J Chem       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Structural basis for amyloidogenic peptide recognition by sorLA.

Authors:  Yu Kitago; Masamichi Nagae; Zenzaburo Nakata; Maho Yagi-Utsumi; Shizuka Takagi-Niidome; Emiko Mihara; Terukazu Nogi; Koichi Kato; Junichi Takagi
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 15.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.