Literature DB >> 19070338

Sensitivity of conditional-discrimination performance to within-session variation of reinforcer frequency.

Ryan D Ward1, Amy L Odum.   

Abstract

The present experiment developed a methodology for assessing sensitivity of conditional-discrimination performance to within-session variation of reinforcer frequency. Four pigeons responded under a multiple schedule of matching-to-sample components in which the ratio of reinforcers for correct S1 and S2 responses was varied across components within session. Initially, five components, each arranging a different reinforcer-frequency ratio (from 1:9 to 9:1), were presented randomly within a session. Under this condition, sensitivity to reinforcer frequency was low. Sensitivity failed to improve after extended exposure to this condition, and under a condition in which only three reinforcer-frequency ratios were varied within session. In a later condition, three reinforcer-frequency ratios were varied within session, but the reinforcer-frequency ratio in effect was differentially signaled within each component. Under this condition, values of sensitivity were similar to those traditionally obtained when reinforcer-frequency ratios for correct responses are varied across conditions. The effects of signaled vs. unsignaled reinforcer-frequency ratios were replicated in two subsequent conditions. The present procedure could provide a practical alternative to parametric variation of reinforcer frequency across conditions and may be useful in characterizing the effects of a variety of manipulations on steady-state sensitivity to reinforcer frequency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19070338      PMCID: PMC2582205          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2008.90-301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  27 in total

1.  Choice in a variable environment: effects of blackout duration and extinction between components.

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Quantitative analyses of matching-to-sample performance.

Authors:  B M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  An investigation of the differential-outcomes effect within sessions.

Authors:  B M Jones; K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory.

Authors:  M C Davison; R D Tustin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Stimuli, reinforcers, and behavior: an integration.

Authors:  M Davison; J Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Matching, statistics, and common sense.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The optimal correction for estimating extreme discriminability.

Authors:  Glenn S Brown; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-08

8.  A theory of attending, remembering, and reinforcement in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Michael Davison; Amy L Odum; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Local effects of delayed food.

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The interaction between stimulus and reinforcer control on remembering.

Authors:  D C McCarthy; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effects of prefeeding, extinction, and distraction during sample and comparison presentation on sensitivity to reinforcer frequency in matching to sample.

Authors:  Ryan D Ward; Robert N Johnson; Amy L Odum
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Pigeon and human performance in a multi-armed bandit task in response to changes in variable interval schedules.

Authors:  Deborah Racey; Michael E Young; Dennis Garlick; Jennifer Ngoc-Minh Pham; Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.986

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.