Literature DB >> 17465314

Local effects of delayed food.

Michael Davison1, William M Baum.   

Abstract

Five pigeons were trained on a procedure in which seven concurrent variable-interval schedules arranged seven different food-rate ratios in random sequence in each session. Each of these components lasted for 10 response-produced food deliveries, and components were separated by 10-s blackouts. We varied delays to food (signaled by blackout) between the two response alternatives in an experiment with three phases: In Phase 1, the delay on one alternative was 0 s, and the other was varied between 0 and 8 s; in Phase 2, both delays were equal and were varied from 0 to 4 s; in Phase 3, the two delays summed to 8 s, and each was varied from 1 to 7 s. The results showed that increasing delay affected local choice, measured by a pulse in preference, in the same way as decreasing magnitude, but we found also that increasing the delay at the other alternative increased local preference. This result casts doubt on the traditional view that a reinforcer strengthens a response depending only on the reinforcer's value discounted by any response-reinforcer delay. The results suggest that food guides, rather than strengthens, behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17465314      PMCID: PMC1832169          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2007.13-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  28 in total

Review 1.  Hyperbolic value addition and general models of animal choice.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Choice in a variable environment: effects of blackout duration and extinction between components.

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Bias and sensitivity to reinforcement in a concurrent-chain schedule.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Stimuli, reinforcers, and behavior: an integration.

Authors:  M Davison; J Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The matching law.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Preference for fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  On the tautology of the matching law.

Authors:  H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Do conditional reinforcers count?

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  8 in total

1.  The Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior at zero, fifty, and one hundred.

Authors:  A Charles Catania
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Sensitivity of conditional-discrimination performance to within-session variation of reinforcer frequency.

Authors:  Ryan D Ward; Amy L Odum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Dynamics of choice: relative rate and amount affect local preference at three different time scales.

Authors:  Carlos F Aparicio; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Dynamics of choice: a tutorial.

Authors:  William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Development and maintenance of choice in a dynamic environment.

Authors:  Andrew M Rodewald; Christine E Hughes; Raymond C Pitts
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reinforcement: food signals the time and location of future food.

Authors:  Sarah Cowie; Michael Davison; Douglas Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Emergent stimulus relations depend on stimulus correlation and not on reinforcement contingencies.

Authors:  Sara Tepaeru Minster; Douglas Elliffe; Suresh D Muthukumaraswamy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Choice in quail neonates: the origins of generalized matching.

Authors:  Susan M Schneider; Robert Lickliter
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.