Literature DB >> 19429198

Effects of prefeeding, extinction, and distraction during sample and comparison presentation on sensitivity to reinforcer frequency in matching to sample.

Ryan D Ward1, Robert N Johnson, Amy L Odum.   

Abstract

The present experiment examined the effects of several test manipulations on discrimination, accuracy and sensitivity to reinforcer frequency in a conditional discrimination. Four pigeons responded on a multiple schedule of matching to sample procedures in which the reinforcer-frequency ratio for correct comparison choice responding was varied across components within session from 1:9 to 9:1. Following stability, the effects of prefeeding, extinction, and distraction during sample and comparison presentation were assessed. Discrimination accuracy decreased under prefeeding, extinction, and distraction during sample presentation. Sensitivity to reinforcer frequency decreased under prefeeding and extinction. Decreases in sensitivity were positively related to decreases in discrimination accuracy. The decreases in discrimination accuracy and sensitivity under prefeeding and extinction are interpreted as being due to decreases in attending to the sample and comparison stimuli, respectively, possibly mediated by motivational effects of these manipulations. This interpretation is consistent with current conceptualizations of the contingencies that govern conditional-discrimination performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19429198      PMCID: PMC2689710          DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  20 in total

1.  Quantitative analyses of matching-to-sample performance.

Authors:  B M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Accuracy of discrimination, rate of responding, and resistance to change.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Jessica Milo; Amy L Odum; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Resistance to change and the law of effect.

Authors:  D N Harper; A P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory.

Authors:  M C Davison; R D Tustin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Stimuli, reinforcers, and behavior: an integration.

Authors:  M Davison; J Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The optimal correction for estimating extreme discriminability.

Authors:  Glenn S Brown; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-08

8.  A theory of attending, remembering, and reinforcement in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Michael Davison; Amy L Odum; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Disruption of temporal discrimination and the choose-short effect.

Authors:  Ryan D Ward; Amy L Odum
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  The interaction between stimulus and reinforcer control on remembering.

Authors:  D C McCarthy; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.