Literature DB >> 11831784

Choice in a variable environment: effects of blackout duration and extinction between components.

Michael Davison1, William M Baum.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained in a procedure in which sessions included seven four- or 10-reinforcer components, each providing a different reinforcer ratio that ranged from 27:1 to 1:27. The components were arranged in random order, and no signals differentiated the component reinforcer ratios. Each condition lasted 50 sessions, and the data from the last 35 sessions were analyzed. Previous results using 10-s blackouts between components showed some carryover of preference from one component to the next, and this effect was investigated in Experiment 1 by varying blackout duration from 1 s to 120 s. The amount of carryover decreased monotonically as the blackout duration was lengthened. Preference also decreased between reinforcers within components, suggesting that preference change during blackout might follow the same function as preference change between reinforcers. Experiment 2 was designed to measure preference change between components more directly and to relate this to preference change during blackout. In two conditions a 60-s blackout occurred between components, and in two other conditions a 60-s period of unsignaled extinction occurred between components. Preference during the extinction period progressively fell toward indifference, and the level of preference following extinction was much the same as that following blackout. Although these results are consistent with Davison and Baum's (2000) theory of the effects of reinforcers on local preference, other findings suggest that theory is incomplete: After a sequence of reinforcers from one alternative, some residual preference remained after 60 s of extinction or blackout, indicating the possibility of an additional longer term accumulation of reinforcer effects than originally suggested.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11831784      PMCID: PMC1284848          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  Reinforcer-ratio variation and its effects on rate of adaptation.

Authors:  J Landon; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Choice in a variable environment: every reinforcer counts.

Authors:  M Davison; W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Are theories of learning necessary?

Authors:  B F SKINNER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1950-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Determination of a behavioral transfer function: White-noise analysis of session-to-session response-ratio dynamics on concurrent VI VI schedules.

Authors:  I Hunter; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Interval reinforcement of choice behavior in discrete trials.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Nonstable concurrent choice in pigeons.

Authors:  G Schofield; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Choice in transition: A comparison of melioration and the kinetic model.

Authors:  J Myerson; S Hale
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Increasing and signaling background reinforcement: effect on the foreground response-reinforcer relation.

Authors:  T W Belke; G M Heyman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  26 in total

1.  Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.

Authors:  Jason Landon; Michael Davison; Douglas Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Choice in a variable environment: effects of unequal reinforcer distributions.

Authors:  Jason Landon; Michael Davison; Douglas Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Concurrent schedules: reinforcer magnitude effects.

Authors:  Jason Landon; Michael Davison; Douglas Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Group foraging sensitivity to predictable and unpredictable changes in food distribution: past experience or present circumstances?

Authors:  Kenneth E Bell; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Dynamical concurrent schedules.

Authors:  William L Palya; Robert W Allan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios.

Authors:  Christian U Krägeloh; Michael Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Choice in a variable environment: visit patterns in the dynamics of choice.

Authors:  William M Baum; Michael Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Time and rate measures in choice transitions.

Authors:  D T Cerutti; J E R Staddon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Rapid acquisition of bias in signal detection: dynamics of effective reinforcement allocation.

Authors:  Blake A Hutsell; Eric A Jacobs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.