Literature DB >> 19056547

Latent inhibition of predator recognition by embryonic amphibians.

Maud C O Ferrari1, Douglas P Chivers.   

Abstract

To avoid being captured, prey animals need to be able to distinguish predators from non-predators. Recent studies have shown that amphibians can learn to recognize their future predators while in the egg. Here, we investigated whether amphibians would similarly be able to learn to recognize non-predators while in the egg. We exposed newly laid wood frog eggs to the odour of tiger salamander or a water control daily for 5 days. After hatching, the wood frog larvae were raised for two weeks at which time we tried to condition them to recognize the salamander as a predator. Larvae were exposed to injured conspecific cues paired with salamander odour, a well-established mode of learning for aquatic prey. When subsequently tested for their response to salamander odour, the larvae pre-exposed to water as embryos showed significant anti-predator responses. However, larvae pre-exposed to the salamander odour as embryos showed no learning of the predator, indicating that they had already learned to recognize the salamander as a non-predator. These results indicate that amphibian embryos can (i) learn to recognize stimuli as non-threatening and (ii) remember it for at least two weeks. The widespread ability of prey to learn to recognize non-predators might explain the persistence of injured conspecific cues as a reliable mechanism for learned predator recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19056547      PMCID: PMC2665813          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  4 in total

1.  Like extinction, latent inhibition of conditioned fear in mice is blocked by systemic inhibition of L-type voltage-gated calcium channels.

Authors:  Mark Barad; Ashley M Blouin; Chris K Cain
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Inbreeding linked to amphibian survival in the wild but not in the laboratory.

Authors:  M A Halverson; D K Skelly; A Caccone
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 2.645

3.  Learning by embryos and the ghost of predation future.

Authors:  Alicia Mathis; Maud C O Ferrari; Nathan Windel; François Messier; Douglas P Chivers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Chemosensory learning in the chicken embryo.

Authors:  H Sneddon; R Hadden; P G Hepper
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1998-05
  4 in total
  12 in total

1.  Embryonic learning and developmental carry-over effects in an invasive anuran.

Authors:  Tiffany S Garcia; Jenny C Urbina; Evan M Bredeweg; Maud C O Ferrari
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Individual learning phenotypes drive collective behavior.

Authors:  Chelsea N Cook; Natalie J Lemanski; Thiago Mosqueiro; Cahit Ozturk; Jürgen Gadau; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Brian H Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Background level of risk determines how prey categorize predators and non-predators.

Authors:  Douglas P Chivers; Mark I McCormick; Matthew D Mitchell; Ryan A Ramasamy; Maud C O Ferrari
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Can embryonic skipper frogs (Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis) learn to recognise kairomones in the absence of a nervous system?

Authors:  Swapnil C Supekar; Narahari P Gramapurohit
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Time-dependent latent inhibition of predator-recognition learning.

Authors:  Adam L Crane; Douglas P Chivers; Maud C O Ferrari
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Context specificity of latent inhibition in the snail Cornu aspersum.

Authors:  Judit Muñiz-Moreno; Ignacio Loy
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Heritable Cognitive Phenotypes Influence Appetitive Learning but not Extinction in Honey Bees.

Authors:  Eda Sezen; Emily Dereszkiewicz; Alvin Hozan; Meghan M Bennett; Cahit Ozturk; Brian H Smith; Chelsea N Cook
Journal:  Ann Entomol Soc Am       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 2.727

8.  Disturbance cues function as a background risk cue but not as an associative learning cue in tadpoles.

Authors:  Ita A E Rivera-Hernández; Adam L Crane; Michael S Pollock; Maud C O Ferrari
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.899

9.  Learning about non-predators and safe places: the forgotten elements of risk assessment.

Authors:  Maud C O Ferrari; Douglas P Chivers
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  When can embryos learn? A test of the timing of learning in embryonic amphibians.

Authors:  Evie K Sehr; Lindsay N Beasley; Kurtis W Wilson; Brian G Gall
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.