Literature DB >> 34512859

Heritable Cognitive Phenotypes Influence Appetitive Learning but not Extinction in Honey Bees.

Eda Sezen1, Emily Dereszkiewicz1, Alvin Hozan1, Meghan M Bennett1,2, Cahit Ozturk1, Brian H Smith1, Chelsea N Cook3.   

Abstract

Learning and attention allow animals to better navigate complex environments. While foraging, honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) learn several aspects of their foraging environment, such as color and odor of flowers, which likely begins to happen before they evaluate the quality of the food. If bees begin to evaluate quality before they taste food, and then learn the food is depleted, this may create a conflict in what the bee learns and remembers. Individual honey bees differ in their sensitivity to information, thus creating variation in how they learn or do not learn certain environmental stimuli. For example, foraging honey bees exhibit differences in latent inhibition (LI), a learning process through which regular encounter with a stimulus without a consequence such as food can later reduce conditioning to that stimulus. Here, we test whether bees from distinct selected LI genotypes learn differently if reinforced via just antennae or via both antennae + proboscis. We also evaluate whether learned information goes extinct at different rates in these distinct LI genetic lines. We find that high LI bees learned significantly better when they were reinforced both antenna + proboscis, while low LI and control bees learned similarly with the two reinforcement pathways. We also find no differences in the acquisition and extinction of learned information in high LI and low LI bees. Our work provides insight into how underlying cognition may influence how honey bees learn and value information, which may lead to differences in how individuals and colonies make foraging decisions.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognition; foraging; honey bees; learning

Year:  2021        PMID: 34512859      PMCID: PMC8423107          DOI: 10.1093/aesa/saab023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Entomol Soc Am        ISSN: 0013-8746            Impact factor:   2.727


  30 in total

Review 1.  Extinction learning, reconsolidation and the internal reinforcement hypothesis.

Authors:  Dorothea Eisenhardt; Randolf Menzel
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 2.  Collective cognition in animal groups.

Authors:  Iain D Couzin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Individual learning phenotypes drive collective behavior.

Authors:  Chelsea N Cook; Natalie J Lemanski; Thiago Mosqueiro; Cahit Ozturk; Jürgen Gadau; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Brian H Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Heritable variation for latent inhibition and its correlation with reversal learning in honeybees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  S B Chandra; J S Hosler; B H Smith
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.231

5.  Using Habituation of Looking Time to Assess Mental Processes in Infancy.

Authors:  Lisa M Oakes
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2010-07-01

6.  Quantitative trait loci associated with reversal learning and latent inhibition in honeybees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  S B Chandra; G J Hunt; S Cobey; B H Smith
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  Responsiveness to sucrose affects tactile and olfactory learning in preforaging honey bees of two genetic strains.

Authors:  R Scheiner; R E Page; J Erber
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2001-04-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Honey bee nest thermoregulation: diversity promotes stability.

Authors:  Julia C Jones; Mary R Myerscough; Sonia Graham; Benjamin P Oldroyd
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-06-24       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Early olfactory, but not gustatory processing, is affected by the selection of heritable cognitive phenotypes in honey bee.

Authors:  Meghan M Bennett; Chelsea N Cook; Brian H Smith; Hong Lei
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  A proboscis extension response protocol for investigating behavioral plasticity in insects: application to basic, biomedical, and agricultural research.

Authors:  Brian H Smith; Christina M Burden
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.