Literature DB >> 32669435

Individual learning phenotypes drive collective behavior.

Chelsea N Cook1,2, Natalie J Lemanski3, Thiago Mosqueiro3, Cahit Ozturk4, Jürgen Gadau5, Noa Pinter-Wollman3, Brian H Smith4.   

Abstract

Individual differences in learning can influence how animals respond to and communicate about their environment, which may nonlinearly shape how a social group accomplishes a collective task. There are few empirical examples of how differences in collective dynamics emerge from variation among individuals in cognition. Here, we use a naturally variable and heritable learning behavior called latent inhibition (LI) to show that interactions among individuals that differ in this cognitive ability drive collective foraging behavior in honey bee colonies. We artificially selected two distinct phenotypes: high-LI bees that ignore previously familiar stimuli in favor of novel ones and low-LI bees that learn familiar and novel stimuli equally well. We then provided colonies differentially composed of different ratios of these phenotypes with a choice between familiar and novel feeders. Colonies of predominantly high-LI individuals preferred to visit familiar food locations, while low-LI colonies visited novel and familiar food locations equally. Interestingly, in colonies of mixed learning phenotypes, the low-LI individuals showed a preference to visiting familiar feeders, which contrasts with their behavior when in a uniform low-LI group. We show that the shift in feeder preference of low-LI bees is driven by foragers of the high-LI phenotype dancing more intensely and attracting more followers. Our results reveal that cognitive abilities of individuals and their social interactions, which we argue relate to differences in attention, drive emergent collective outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognition; collective behavior; honey bee; latent inhibition; learning

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32669435      PMCID: PMC7395545          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1920554117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  34 in total

Review 1.  Learning and selective attention.

Authors:  P Dayan; S Kakade; P R Montague
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Uninformed individuals promote democratic consensus in animal groups.

Authors:  Iain D Couzin; Christos C Ioannou; Güven Demirel; Thilo Gross; Colin J Torney; Andrew Hartnett; Larissa Conradt; Simon A Levin; Naomi E Leonard
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Molecular determinants of scouting behavior in honey bees.

Authors:  Zhengzheng S Liang; Trang Nguyen; Heather R Mattila; Sandra L Rodriguez-Zas; Thomas D Seeley; Gene E Robinson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Biases in signal evolution: learning makes a difference.

Authors:  Carel ten Cate; Candy Rowe
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 5.  Collective cognition in animal groups.

Authors:  Iain D Couzin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  Context, learning, and extinction.

Authors:  Samuel J Gershman; David M Blei; Yael Niv
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Cognitive ecology: the evolutionary ecology of information processing and decision making.

Authors:  M Stamp Dawkins
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Heritable variation for latent inhibition and its correlation with reversal learning in honeybees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  S B Chandra; J S Hosler; B H Smith
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 9.  The importance of individual variation in the dynamics of animal collective movements.

Authors:  Maria Del Mar Delgado; Maria Miranda; Silvia J Alvarez; Eliezer Gurarie; William F Fagan; Vincenzo Penteriani; Agustina di Virgilio; Juan Manuel Morales
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Restraint and cancellation: multiple inhibition deficits in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Russell Schachar; Gordon D Logan; Philippe Robaey; Shirley Chen; Abel Ickowicz; Cathy Barr
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2007-03-10
View more
  4 in total

1.  Individual learning phenotypes drive collective behavior.

Authors:  Chelsea N Cook; Natalie J Lemanski; Thiago Mosqueiro; Cahit Ozturk; Jürgen Gadau; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Brian H Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Heritable Cognitive Phenotypes Influence Appetitive Learning but not Extinction in Honey Bees.

Authors:  Eda Sezen; Emily Dereszkiewicz; Alvin Hozan; Meghan M Bennett; Cahit Ozturk; Brian H Smith; Chelsea N Cook
Journal:  Ann Entomol Soc Am       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 2.727

3.  Gut microbiome drives individual memory variation in bumblebees.

Authors:  Li Li; Cwyn Solvi; Feng Zhang; Zhaoyang Qi; Lars Chittka; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Early olfactory, but not gustatory processing, is affected by the selection of heritable cognitive phenotypes in honey bee.

Authors:  Meghan M Bennett; Chelsea N Cook; Brian H Smith; Hong Lei
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 1.836

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.