Literature DB >> 16957048

Inbreeding linked to amphibian survival in the wild but not in the laboratory.

M A Halverson1, D K Skelly, A Caccone.   

Abstract

We examined the effects of inbreeding on the performance of wood frog (Rana sylvatica) larvae in the field and in the laboratory. We used microsatellite analysis to establish the parentage and degree of inbreeding of the larvae. Two different estimators of inbreeding were used. The first was based on average multilocus heterozygosity, and the second was based on a molecular relatedness estimator. The estimators were highly correlated, and both showed a significant negative relationship between inbreeding and survival in the wild. However, there was no evidence that inbreeding influenced growth or development in the wild. Neither was there any evidence that inbreeding affected survival, growth, or development in the laboratory. These results suggest that, for wood frogs, inbreeding has a bigger effect on fitness in the wild than in captivity and that measurements of survival are more sensitive than measures of growth or development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16957048     DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esl019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hered        ISSN: 0022-1503            Impact factor:   2.645


  8 in total

1.  Latent inhibition of predator recognition by embryonic amphibians.

Authors:  Maud C O Ferrari; Douglas P Chivers
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  Genetic variation, inbreeding and chemical exposure--combined effects in wildlife and critical considerations for ecotoxicology.

Authors:  A Ross Brown; David J Hosken; François Balloux; Lisa K Bickley; Gareth LePage; Stewart F Owen; Malcolm J Hetheridge; Charles R Tyler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Nutrition and health in amphibian husbandry.

Authors:  Gina M Ferrie; Vance C Alford; Jim Atkinson; Eric Baitchman; Diane Barber; William S Blaner; Graham Crawshaw; Andy Daneault; Ellen Dierenfeld; Mark Finke; Greg Fleming; Ron Gagliardo; Eric A Hoffman; William Karasov; Kirk Klasing; Elizabeth Koutsos; Julia Lankton; Shana R Lavin; Andrew Lentini; Shannon Livingston; Brad Lock; Tom Mason; Alejandra McComb; Cheryl Morris; Allan P Pessier; Francisco Olea-Popelka; Tom Probst; Carlos Rodriguez; Kristine Schad; Kent Semmen; Jamie Sincage; M Andrew Stamper; Jason Steinmetz; Kathleen Sullivan; Scott Terrell; Nina Wertan; Catharine J Wheaton; Brad Wilson; Eduardo V Valdes
Journal:  Zoo Biol       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 1.421

4.  Learning about non-predators and safe places: the forgotten elements of risk assessment.

Authors:  Maud C O Ferrari; Douglas P Chivers
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Rapid selection against inbreeding in a wild population of a rare frog.

Authors:  Gentile Francesco Ficetola; Trenton W J Garner; Jinliang Wang; Fiorenza De Bernardi
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 5.183

6.  The female perspective of mating in A. femoralis, a territorial frog with paternal care--a spatial and genetic analysis.

Authors:  Eva Ringler; Max Ringler; Robert Jehle; Walter Hödl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Evolutionary principles guiding amphibian conservation.

Authors:  Maciej Pabijan; Gemma Palomar; Bernardo Antunes; Weronika Antoł; Piotr Zieliński; Wiesław Babik
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 5.183

8.  Heterozygosity is linked to the costs of immunity in nestling great tits (Parus major).

Authors:  Beatrice Voegeli; Verena Saladin; Michèle Wegmann; Heinz Richner
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.