Literature DB >> 19050942

Biotribological evaluation of artificial disc arthroplasty devices: influence of loading and kinematic patterns during in vitro wear simulation.

Thomas M Grupp1, James J Yue, Rolando Garcia, Janet Basson, Jens Schwiesau, Bernhard Fritz, Wilhelm Blömer.   

Abstract

Wear simulation is an essential pre-clinical method to predict the mid- and long-term clinical wear behavior of newly introduced devices for total disc arthroplasty. The main requirement of a suitable method for spinal wear simulation has to be the ability to distinguish between design concepts and allow for a direct comparison of predicate devices. The objective of our study was to investigate the influence of loading and kinematic patterns based on two different protocols for spinal wear simulation (ISO/FDIS 18192-1 (2006) and ASTM F2423-05). In vitro wear simulation was performed with six activ L lumbar artificial disc devices (Aesculap Tuttlingen, Germany). The applied kinematic pattern of movement was multidirectional for ISO (elliptic track) and unidirectional with a curvilinear shape for ASTM. Testing was done for 10 million cycles in the ISO loading mode and afterwards with the same specimens for 5 million cycles according to the ASTM protocol with a customized six-station servohydraulic spinal wear simulator (EndoLab Thansau, Germany). Gravimetrical and geometrical wear assessment, a slide track analysis correlated to an optical surface characterization, and an estimation of particle size and morphology were performed. The gravimetric wear rate for the first 10 million cycles was ISO(initial) = 2.7 +/- 0.3 mg/million cycles. During the ASTM test period (10-15 million cycles) a gravimetric wear rate of 0.14 +/- 0.06 mg/million cycles was estimated. The wear rates between the ISO and ASTM driven simulations differ substantially (approximately 20-fold) and statistical analysis demonstrates a significant difference (p < 0.001) between the test groups. The main explanation of divergency between ISO and ASTM driven wear simulations is the multidirectional pattern of movement described in the ISO document resulting in a cross-shear stress on the polyethylene material. Due to previous retrieval observations, it seems to be very unlikely that a lumbar artificial disc is loaded with a linear wear path.Testing according to ASTM F2423-05 with pure unidirectional motion does not reflect the kinematics of TDA patients' daily activities. Based on our findings it seems to be more reliable to predict the clinical wear behavior of an artificial disc replacement using the ISO/FDIS 18192-1 method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19050942      PMCID: PMC2615125          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0840-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  41 in total

Review 1.  Biological reactions to wear debris in total joint replacement.

Authors:  E Ingham; J Fisher
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.617

2.  Slide track analysis of the relative motion between femoral head and acetabular cup in walking and in hip simulators.

Authors:  Vesa Saikko; Olof Calonius
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Minimally invasive total disc replacement: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results.

Authors:  H M Mayer; K Wiechert; A Korge; I Qose
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-08-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Non-fusion technology in degenerative lumbar spinal disorders: facts, questions, challenges.

Authors:  H Michael Mayer; Andreas Korge
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-08-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Spine arthroplasty: a historical review.

Authors:  Marek Szpalski; Robert Gunzburg; Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-08-13       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Quantification of the effect of cross-shear on the wear of conventional and highly cross-linked UHMWPE.

Authors:  Lu Kang; Alison L Galvin; Thomas D Brown; Zhongmin Jin; John Fisher
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications.

Authors:  Rudolf Bertagnoli; Selva Kumar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-09-06       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Artificial disc: preliminary results of a prospective study in the United States.

Authors:  Stephen H Hochschuler; Donna D Ohnmeiss; Richard D Guyer; Scott L Blumenthal
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-09-13       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Isolation and morphological characterisation of UHMWPE wear debris generated in vitro.

Authors:  S Affatato; B Fernandes; A Tucci; L Esposito; A Toni
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  The biologic response to particles from a lumbar disc prosthesis.

Authors:  Robert J Moore; Robert D Fraser; Barrie Vernon-Roberts; John W Finnie; Peter C Blumbergs; David R Haynes; Martin J Hutchens; Rebecca M Walters; Anant S Kamat; Barbara Koszyca
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  16 in total

1.  The use of self-mating PEEK as an alternative bearing material for cervical disc arthroplasty: a comparison of different simulator inputs and tribological environments.

Authors:  Tim Brown; Qi-Bin Bao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Preferential superior surface motion in wear simulations of the Charité total disc replacement.

Authors:  Curtis M Goreham-Voss; Rachel Vicars; Richard M Hall; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Influence of the loading frequency on the wear rate of a polyethylene-on-metal lumbar intervertebral disc replacement.

Authors:  Annette Kettler; Michael Bushelow; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-10       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Evaluation of impingement behaviour in lumbar spinal disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas M Grupp; James J Yue; Rolando Garcia; Christian Kaddick; Bernhard Fritz; Christoph Schilling; Jens Schwiesau; Wilhelm Blömer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  [Keel-implants: Activ-L].

Authors:  Karsten Wiechert
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.154

6.  The effect of anterior-posterior shear load on the wear of ProDisc-L TDR.

Authors:  R Vicars; P J Hyde; T D Brown; J L Tipper; E Ingham; J Fisher; R M Hall
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Midterm osteolysis-induced aseptic failure of the M6-C™ cervical total disc replacement secondary to polyethylene wear debris.

Authors:  Matthew Scott-Young; Evelyne Rathbone; Lauren Grierson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.721

8.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

9.  Can prevention of a reherniation be investigated? Establishment of a herniation model and experiments with an anular closure device.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; Lena Ressel; Frank Heuer; Nicolas Graf; Stefan Rath
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The LP-ESP(®) lumbar disc prosthesis with 6 degrees of freedom: development and 7 years of clinical experience.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Lazennec; Alain Aaron; Adrien Brusson; Jean-Patrick Rakover; Marc-Antoine Rousseau
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-01-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.