Literature DB >> 20524073

A poisson process model for hip fracture risk.

Zvi Schechner1, Gangming Luo, Jonathan J Kaufman, Robert S Siffert.   

Abstract

The primary method for assessing fracture risk in osteoporosis relies primarily on measurement of bone mass. Estimation of fracture risk is most often evaluated using logistic or proportional hazards models. Notwithstanding the success of these models, there is still much uncertainty as to who will or will not suffer a fracture. This has led to a search for other components besides mass that affect bone strength. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a new mechanistic stochastic model that characterizes the risk of hip fracture in an individual. A Poisson process is used to model the occurrence of falls, which are assumed to occur at a rate, lambda. The load induced by a fall is assumed to be a random variable that has a Weibull probability distribution. The combination of falls together with loads leads to a compound Poisson process. By retaining only those occurrences of the compound Poisson process that result in a hip fracture, a thinned Poisson process is defined that itself is a Poisson process. The fall rate is modeled as an affine function of age, and hip strength is modeled as a power law function of bone mineral density (BMD). The risk of hip fracture can then be computed as a function of age and BMD. By extending the analysis to a Bayesian framework, the conditional densities of BMD given a prior fracture and no prior fracture can be computed and shown to be consistent with clinical observations. In addition, the conditional probabilities of fracture given a prior fracture and no prior fracture can also be computed, and also demonstrate results similar to clinical data. The model elucidates the fact that the hip fracture process is inherently random and improvements in hip strength estimation over and above that provided by BMD operate in a highly "noisy" environment and may therefore have little ability to impact clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20524073     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-010-0638-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  52 in total

1.  Bone quality: summary of NIH/ASBMR meeting.

Authors:  G Lester
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.041

2.  Prediction of the fracture load of whole proximal femur specimens by topological analysis of the mineral distribution in DXA-scan images.

Authors:  Holger F Boehm; Annie Horng; Mike Notohamiprodjo; Felix Eckstein; Dominik Burklein; Alexandra Panteleon; Juergen Lutz; Maximilian Reiser
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Dynamic relationships of trabecular bone density, architecture, and strength in a computational model of osteopenia.

Authors:  R S Siffert; G M Luo; S C Cowin; J J Kaufman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Hip impact velocities and body configurations for voluntary falls from standing height.

Authors:  A J van den Kroonenberg; W C Hayes; T A McMahon
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Low BMD is less predictive than reported falls for future limb fractures in women across Europe: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  S Kaptoge; L I Benevolenskaya; A K Bhalla; J B Cannata; S Boonen; J A Falch; D Felsenberg; J D Finn; R Nuti; K Hoszowski; R Lorenc; T Miazgowski; I Jajic; G Lyritis; P Masaryk; M Naves-Diaz; G Poor; D M Reid; C Scheidt-Nave; J J Stepan; C J Todd; K Weber; A D Woolf; D K Roy; M Lunt; S R Pye; T W O'neill; A J Silman; J Reeve
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry.

Authors:  X G Cheng; G Lowet; S Boonen; P H Nicholson; P Brys; J Nijs; J Dequeker
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; H Johansson; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Relationship of early changes in bone resorption to the reduction in fracture risk with risedronate.

Authors:  R Eastell; I Barton; R A Hannon; A Chines; P Garnero; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 10.  Osteoporosis: a review.

Authors:  Julie T Lin; Joseph M Lane
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  1 in total

1.  A mechanical model for predicting the probability of osteoporotic hip fractures based in DXA measurements and finite element simulation.

Authors:  Enrique López; Elena Ibarz; Antonio Herrera; Jesús Mateo; Antonio Lobo-Escolar; Sergio Puértolas; Luis Gracia
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 2.819

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.