Literature DB >> 10768400

Relationships between femoral fracture loads for two load configurations.

J H Keyak1.   

Abstract

Studies of proximal femoral strength usually involve one of two types of loading conditions, loading similar to joint loading during single-limb stance or loading simulating impact from a fall. When interpreting the results of studies involving only one of these load configurations, the question arises as to their applicability to the other configuration. In addition, it is desirable to know whether, for an individual bone, fracture load for one load configuration is indicative of fracture load for the other configuration. In this study, the relationship between proximal femoral fracture loads for single-limb stance loading and loading simulating impact from a type of fall was determined from mechanical testing of 17 matched pairs of human proximal femora. Fracture loads for these two configurations were found to be linearly related (r = 0.901, p < 0.001). However, the correlation between fracture loads is not notably stronger than correlations currently available between fracture load and measures of bone density and geometry. In addition, the regression results indicate that 81% of the variance in fracture load for one loading condition is accounted for by fracture load for the other loading condition. Thus, 19% of the variance remains unexplained, indicating that the results of studies involving only one load configuration are not necessarily indicative of those that would be found for another configuration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10768400     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00202-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  9 in total

Review 1.  Sideways fall-induced impact force and its effect on hip fracture risk: a review.

Authors:  M Nasiri Sarvi; Y Luo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  QCT-based failure analysis of proximal femurs under various loading orientations.

Authors:  Majid Mirzaei; Maziyar Keshavarzian; Fatemeh Alavi; Pegah Amiri; Saeid Samiezadeh
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Physical Activity for Strengthening Fracture Prone Regions of the Proximal Femur.

Authors:  Robyn K Fuchs; Mariana E Kersh; Julio Carballido-Gamio; William R Thompson; Joyce H Keyak; Stuart J Warden
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  The Influence of Static Load and Sideways Impact Fall on Extramedullary Bone Plates Used to Treat Intertrochanteric Femoral Fracture: A Preclinical Strength Assessment.

Authors:  Pratik Nag; Bhaskar Borgohain; Kashif Akhtar Ahmed; Pranjal Phukan; Neeraj Kumar; Alireza Borjali; Kartik Mangudi Varadarajan; Souptick Chanda
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.219

5.  Finite element analysis of the proximal femur and hip fracture risk in older men.

Authors:  Eric S Orwoll; Lynn M Marshall; Carrie M Nielson; Steven R Cummings; Jodi Lapidus; Jane A Cauley; Kristine Ensrud; Nancy Lane; Paul R Hoffmann; David L Kopperdahl; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Shear strength behavior of human trabecular bone.

Authors:  Arnav Sanyal; Atul Gupta; Harun H Bayraktar; Ronald Y Kwon; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Femoral bone strength and its relation to cortical and trabecular changes after treatment with PTH, alendronate, and their combination as assessed by finite element analysis of quantitative CT scans.

Authors:  Tony M Keaveny; Paul F Hoffmann; Mandeep Singh; Lisa Palermo; John P Bilezikian; Susan L Greenspan; Dennis M Black
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: relationships linking geometric and densitometric variables to bone strength. Role for compact bone.

Authors:  V Bousson; A Le Bras; F Roqueplan; Y Kang; D Mitton; S Kolta; C Bergot; W Skalli; E Vicaut; W Kalender; K Engelke; J-D Laredo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Hip protectors: recommendations for biomechanical testing--an international consensus statement (part I).

Authors:  S N Robinovitch; S L Evans; J Minns; A C Laing; P Kannus; P A Cripton; S Derler; S J Birge; D Plant; I D Cameron; D P Kiel; J Howland; K Khan; J B Lauritzen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 4.507

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.