Literature DB >> 18391567

Sensitivity to interaural level difference and loudness growth with bilateral bimodal stimulation.

Tom Francart1, Jan Brokx, Jan Wouters.   

Abstract

The interaural level difference (ILD) is an important cue for the localization of sound sources. The sensitivity to ILD was measured in 10 users of a cochlear implant (CI) in one ear and a hearing aid (HA) in the other severely impaired ear. For simultaneous presentation of a pulse train on the CI side and a sinusoid on the HA side the just noticeable difference (JND) in ILD and loudness growth functions were measured. The mean JND for pitch-matched electric and acoustic stimulation was 1.7 dB. A linear fit of the loudness growth functions on a decibel-versus-microampere scale shows that the slope depends on the subject's dynamic ranges. Copyright 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18391567     DOI: 10.1159/000124279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  12 in total

1.  Current and planned cochlear implant research at New York University Laboratory for Translational Auditory Research.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Matthew B Fitzgerald; Arlene Neuman; Elad Sagi; Chin-Tuan Tan; Darlene Ketten; Brett Martin
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  A new software tool to optimize frequency table selection for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Daniel Jethanamest; Chin-Tuan Tan; Matthew B Fitzgerald; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Sensitivity to interaural time differences with combined cochlear implant and acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Jan Brokx; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-12-02

4.  Binaural advantages in users of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant devices.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Natalie Pak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Pitch Matching between Electrical Stimulation of a Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimuli Presented to a Contralateral Ear with Residual Hearing.

Authors:  Chin-Tuan Tan; Brett Martin; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  A potential neurophysiological correlate of electric-acoustic pitch matching in adult cochlear implant users: Pilot data.

Authors:  Chin-Tuan Tan; Brett A Martin; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2018-03-06

7.  Gradual adaptation to auditory frequency mismatch.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Thomas M Talavage; Shivank Sinha; Heidi Neuburger; Mahan Azadpour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  [Speech perception with electric-acoustic stimulation : Comparison with bilateral cochlear implant users in different noise conditions].

Authors:  T Rader
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Benefits of localization and speech perception with multiple noise sources in listeners with a short-electrode cochlear implant.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Ann Perreau; Bruce Gantz; Richard S Tyler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Speech perception and localisation with SCORE bimodal: a loudness normalisation strategy for combined cochlear implant and hearing aid stimulation.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Hugh McDermott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.