Literature DB >> 3700864

A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels.

A K Syrdal, H S Gopal.   

Abstract

A quantitative perceptual model of human vowel recognition based upon psychoacoustic and speech perception data is described. At an intermediate auditory stage of processing, the specific bark difference level of the model represents the pattern of peripheral auditory excitation as the distance in critical bands (barks) between neighboring formants and between the fundamental frequency (F0) and first formant (F1). At a higher, phonetic stage of processing, represented by the critical bark difference level of the model, the transformed vowels may be dichotomously classified based on whether the difference between formants in each dimension falls within or exceeds the critical distance of 3 bark for the spectral center of gravity effect [Chistovich et al., Hear. Res. 1, 185-195 (1979)]. Vowel transformations and classifications correspond well to several major phonetic dimensions and features by which vowels are perceived and traditionally classified. The F1-F0 dimension represents vowel height, and high vowels have F1-F0 differences within 3 bark. The F3-F2 dimension corresponds to vowel place of articulation, and front vowels have F3-F2 differences of less than 3 bark. As an inherent, speaker-independent normalization procedure, the model provides excellent vowel clustering while it greatly reduces between-speaker variability. It offers robust normalization through feature classification because gross binary categorization allows for considerable acoustic variability. There was generally less formant and bark difference variability for closely spaced formants than for widely spaced formants. These findings agree with independently observed perceptual results and support Stevens' quantal theory of vowel production and perceptual constraints on production predicted from the critical bark difference level of the model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3700864     DOI: 10.1121/1.393381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  51 in total

1.  Perception of articulatory dynamics from acoustic signatures.

Authors:  Khalil Iskarous; Hosung Nam; D H Whalen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Some consequences of stimulus variability on speech processing by 2-month-old infants.

Authors:  P W Jusczyk; D B Pisoni; J Mullennix
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1992-06

3.  Speech perception, rapid temporal processing, and the left hemisphere: a case study of unilateral pure word deafness.

Authors:  L Robert Slevc; Randi C Martin; A Cris Hamilton; Marc F Joanisse
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Vowel acoustic space development in children: a synthesis of acoustic and anatomic data.

Authors:  Houri K Vorperian; Ray D Kent
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Dynamic spectral structure specifies vowels for children and adults.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Acoustic and auditory phonetics: the adaptive design of speech sound systems.

Authors:  Randy L Diehl
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Integrating speech information across talkers, gender, and sensory modality: female faces and male voices in the McGurk effect.

Authors:  K P Green; P K Kuhl; A N Meltzoff; E B Stevens
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-12

8.  Effects of spectral modulation filtering on vowel identification.

Authors:  Chang Liu; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The perceived clarity of children's speech varies as a function of their default articulation rate.

Authors:  Melissa A Redford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Resonance Effects and the Vocalization of Speech.

Authors:  Brad Rakerd; Eric J Hunter; Peter Lapine
Journal:  Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups       Date:  2019-12-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.