Literature DB >> 3824069

Mechanical response of a lumbar motion segment in axial torque alone and combined with compression.

A Shirazi-Adl, A M Ahmed, S C Shrivastava.   

Abstract

In the current study, a nonlinear three-dimensional finite element program has been used to analyze the response of a lumbar L2-3 motion segment subjected to axial torque alone and combined with compression. The analysis accounts both for material and geometric nonlinearities and treats the facet articulation as a general moving-contact problem. The disc nucleus has been considered as an incompressible inviscid fluid and the annulus as a composite of collagenous fibers embedded in a matrix of ground substance. The spinal ligaments have been modeled as a collection of nonlinear axial elements. Effects of loss of intradiscal pressure and removal of the facets on the joint response have been analyzed as well. Torsion is primarily resisted by the articular facets that are in contact and the disc annulus. The ligaments play an insignificant role in this respect. For the intact segment, with an increase in torque, the axis of rotation shifts posteriorly in the disc so that under maximum torque it is located posterior to the disc itself. Loss of disc pressure increases this posterior shift whereas removal of the facets decreases it. Torque, by itself, cannot cause the failure of disc fibers, but can enhance the vulnerability of those fibers located at the posterolateral and posterior locations when the torque acts in combination with other types of loading, such as flexion. The most vulnerable element of the segment in torque is the posterior bony structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3824069     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198611000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  52 in total

1.  The importance of the endplate for interbody cages in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Stephen J Ferguson; Lutz P Nolte; Tracy E Orr
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Influence of graded facetectomy and laminectomy on spinal biomechanics.

Authors:  T Zander; A Rohlmann; C Klöckner; G Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Factors influencing stresses in the lumbar spine after the insertion of intervertebral cages: finite element analysis.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Stephen J Ferguson; Lutz P Nolte; Tracy E Orr
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Kinematic response of lumbar functional spinal units to axial torsion with and without superimposed compression and flexion/extension.

Authors:  Hannes Haberl; Peter A Cripton; Tracy-E Orr; Thomas Beutler; Hanspeter Frei; Wolfgang R Lanksch; L-P Nolte
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Influence of fatigue in neuromuscular control of spinal stability.

Authors:  Kevin P Granata; Greg P Slota; Sara E Wilson
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  Spinal muscle forces, internal loads and stability in standing under various postures and loads--application of kinematics-based algorithm.

Authors:  A Shirazi-Adl; M El-Rich; D G Pop; M Parnianpour
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-09-25       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Optimal stiffness of a pedicle-screw-based motion preservation implant for the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Thomas Zander; Georg Bergmann; Hadi N Boustani
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Cervical laminoplasty construct stability: an experimental and finite element investigation.

Authors:  Srinivas C Tadepalli; Anup A Gandhi; Douglas C Fredericks; Nicole M Grosland; Joseph Smucker
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2011

9.  Comparison of the biomechanical effects of posterior and anterior spine-stabilizing implants.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; T Zander; G Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Nagananda K Burra; Thomas Zander; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.