Literature DB >> 21380572

In silico evaluation of a new composite disc substitute with a L3-L5 lumbar spine finite element model.

Jérôme Noailly1, Luigi Ambrosio, K Elizabeth Tanner, Josep A Planell, Damien Lacroix.   

Abstract

When the intervertebral disc is removed to relieve chronic pain, subsequent segment stabilization should restore the functional mechanics of the native disc. Because of partially constrained motions and the lack of intrinsic rotational stiffness ball-on-socket implants present many disadvantages. Composite disc substitutes mimicking healthy disc structures should be able to assume the role expected for a disc substitute with fewer restrictions than ball-on-socket implants. A biomimetic composite disc prototype including artificial nucleus fibre-reinforced annulus and endplates was modelled as an L4-L5 disc substitute within a L3-L5 lumbar spine finite element model. Different device updates, i.e. changes of material properties fibre distributions and volume fractions and nucleus placements were proposed. Load- and displacement-controlled rotations were simulated with and without body weight applied. The original prototype reduced greatly the flexibility of the treated segment with significant adjacent level effects under displacement-controlled or hybrid rotations. Device updates allowed restoring large part of the global axial and sagittal rotational flexibility predicted with the intact model. Material properties played a major role, but some other updates were identified to potentially tune the device behaviour against specific motions. All device versions altered the coupled intersegmental shear deformations affecting facet joint contact through contact area displacements. Loads in the bony endplates adjacent to the implants increased as the implant stiffness decreased but did not appear to be a strong limitation for the implant biomechanical and mechanobiological functionality. In conclusion, numerical results given by biomimetic composite disc substitutes were encouraging with greater potential than that offered by ball-on-socket implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21380572      PMCID: PMC3377799          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1716-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  40 in total

1.  How does the geometry affect the internal biomechanics of a lumbar spine bi-segment finite element model? Consequences on the validation process.

Authors:  Jérôme Noailly; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Josep A Planell; Damien Lacroix
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Load- and displacement-controlled finite element analyses on fusion and non-fusion spinal implants.

Authors:  Z-C Zhong; S-H Chen; C-H Hung
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.617

3.  Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics.

Authors:  Thomas Zander; Antonius Rohlmann; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2009-01-03       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Biomechanical comparison between lumbar disc arthroplasty and fusion.

Authors:  Shih-Hao Chen; Zheng-Cheng Zhong; Chen-Sheng Chen; Wen-Jer Chen; Chinghua Hung
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  Effect of an artificial disc on lumbar spine biomechanics: a probabilistic finite element study.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Anke Mann; Thomas Zander; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-11-29       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Jack Zigler; Rick Delamarter; Jeffrey M Spivak; Raymond J Linovitz; Guy O Danielson; Thomas T Haider; Frank Cammisa; Jim Zuchermann; Richard Balderston; Scott Kitchel; Kevin Foley; Robert Watkins; David Bradford; James Yue; Hansen Yuan; Harry Herkowitz; Doug Geiger; John Bendo; Timothy Peppers; Barton Sachs; Federico Girardi; Michael Kropf; Jeff Goldstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  James S Harrop; Jim A Youssef; Mitch Maltenfort; Peggy Vorwald; Pascal Jabbour; Christopher M Bono; Neil Goldfarb; Alexander R Vaccaro; Alan S Hilibrand
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Analysis of post-operative pain patterns following total lumbar disc replacement: results from fluoroscopically guided spine infiltrations.

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Andreas Korge; Frank Grochulla; Christoph Mehren; H Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Dynamic-mechanical properties of a novel composite intervertebral disc prosthesis.

Authors:  Antonio Gloria; Filippo Causa; Roberto De Santis; Paolo Antonio Netti; Luigi Ambrosio
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 10.  An evidence-based medicine approach in determining factors that may affect outcome in lumbar total disc replacement.

Authors:  Michael R Zindrick; Michael N Tzermiadianos; Leonard I Voronov; Mark Lorenz; Alexander Hadjipavlou
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of biomechanical properties of anterior atlantoaxial transarticular locking plate system using three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Xian-hua Cai; Zhi-chao Liu; Yang Yu; Mei-chao Zhang; Wei-bing Huang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Challenges and strategies in the repair of ruptured annulus fibrosus.

Authors:  C C Guterl; E Y See; S B G Blanquer; A Pandit; S J Ferguson; L M Benneker; D W Grijpma; D Sakai; D Eglin; M Alini; J C Iatridis; S Grad
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 3.942

3.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

Review 4.  On the relative relevance of subject-specific geometries and degeneration-specific mechanical properties for the study of cell death in human intervertebral disk models.

Authors:  Andrea Malandrino; José M Pozo; Isaac Castro-Mateos; Alejandro F Frangi; Marc M van Rijsbergen; Keita Ito; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Tien Tuan Dao; Marie-Christine Ho Ba Tho; Jérôme Noailly
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-02-11

5.  ISASS Policy Statement - Lumbar Artificial Disc.

Authors:  Jack Zigler; Rolando Garcia
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-03-12

Review 6.  Biomechanical modelling of the facet joints: a review of methods and validation processes in finite element analysis.

Authors:  Marlène Mengoni
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2020-11-22

7.  Patient-Specific Variations in Local Strain Patterns on the Surface of a Trussed Titanium Interbody Cage.

Authors:  Arjan C Y Loenen; Jérôme Noailly; Keita Ito; Paul C Willems; Jacobus J Arts; Bert van Rietbergen
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-11

Review 8.  From Mechanobiology to Mechanical Repair Strategies: A Bibliometric Analysis of Biomechanical Studies of Intervertebral Discs.

Authors:  Dian Zhang; Minshan Feng; Wei Liu; Jie Yu; Xu Wei; Kexin Yang; Jiawen Zhan; Wei Peng; Mingyi Luo; Tao Han; Zhefeng Jin; He Yin; Kai Sun; Xunlu Yin; Liguo Zhu
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 2.832

9.  Musculoskeletal Modeling of the Lumbar Spine to Explore Functional Interactions between Back Muscle Loads and Intervertebral Disk Multiphysics.

Authors:  Themis Toumanidou; Jérôme Noailly
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-08-05

10.  Comparison of patient-specific computational models vs. clinical follow-up, for adjacent segment disc degeneration and bone remodelling after spinal fusion.

Authors:  Marc van Rijsbergen; Bert van Rietbergen; Veronique Barthelemy; Peter Eltes; Áron Lazáry; Damien Lacroix; Jérôme Noailly; Marie-Christine Ho Ba Tho; Wouter Wilson; Keita Ito
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.