Literature DB >> 7644953

Role of ligaments and facets in lumbar spinal stability.

M Sharma1, N A Langrana, J Rodriguez.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: The issue of segmental stability using finite element analysis was studied. Effect of ligament and facet (total and partial) removal and their geometry on segment response were studied from the viewpoint of stability.
OBJECTIVES: To predict factors that may be linked to the cause of rotational instabilities, spondylolisthesis, retrospondylolisthesis, and stenosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The study provides a comprehensive study on the role of facets and ligaments and their geometry in preserving segmental stability. No previous biomechanical study has explored these issues in detail.
METHODS: Three-dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis was performed on L3-L4 motion segments, with and without posterior elements (ligaments and facets), subjected to sagittal moments. Effects of ligament and facet (partial and total) removal and their orientations on segment response are examined from the viewpoint of stability.
RESULTS: Ligaments play an important role in resisting flexion rotation and posterior shear whereas facets are mainly responsible for preventing large extension rotation and anterior displacement. Facet loads and stresses are high under large extension and anterior shear loading. Unlike total facetectomy, selective removal of facets does not compromise segmental stability. Facet loads are dependent on spatial orientation.
CONCLUSIONS: Rotational instability in flexion or posterior displacement (retrospondylolisthesis) is unlikely without prior damage of ligaments, whereas instability in extension rotation or forward displacement (spondylolisthesis) is unlikely before facet degeneration or removal. The facet stress and displacement distribution predicts that facet osteoarthritis or hypertrophy leading to spinal stenosis is most likely under flexion-anterior shear loading. Selective facetectomy may restore spinal canal size without compromising the stability of the segment. A facet that is more sagittally oriented may be linked to the cause of spondylolisthesis, whereas a less transversely oriented facet joint may be linked to rotational instabilities in extension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7644953     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199504150-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  67 in total

1.  Simulation of the behaviour of the L1 vertebra for different material properties and loading conditions.

Authors:  Ibrahim Erdem; Eeric Truumees; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 1.763

2.  Factors influencing stresses in the lumbar spine after the insertion of intervertebral cages: finite element analysis.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Stephen J Ferguson; Lutz P Nolte; Tracy E Orr
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Optimal stiffness of a pedicle-screw-based motion preservation implant for the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Thomas Zander; Georg Bergmann; Hadi N Boustani
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Development of a novel radiographic measure of lumbar instability and validation using the facet fluid sign.

Authors:  John A Hipp; Richard D Guyer; Jack E Zigler; Donna D Ohnmeiss; Nicholas D Wharton
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

5.  Role of facet curvature for accurate vertebral facet load analysis.

Authors:  Gerhard A Holzapfel; Michael Stadler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Upright, weight-bearing, dynamic-kinetic MRI of the spine: initial results.

Authors:  J Randy Jinkins; Jay S Dworkin; Raymond V Damadian
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-05-20       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Inclusion of regional poroelastic material properties better predicts biomechanical behavior of lumbar discs subjected to dynamic loading.

Authors:  Jamie R Williams; Raghu N Natarajan; Gunnar B J Andersson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Morphometric analyses of the cervical superior facets and implications for facet dislocation.

Authors:  Nabil A Ebraheim; Vishwas Patil; Jiayong Liu; Steve P Haman; Richard A Yeasting
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Nagananda K Burra; Thomas Zander; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Validation of a clinical finite element model of the human lumbosacral spine.

Authors:  Yabo Guan; Narayan Yoganandan; Jiangyue Zhang; Frank A Pintar; Joesph F Cusick; Christopher E Wolfla; Dennis J Maiman
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-07-08       Impact factor: 2.602

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.