Literature DB >> 11765398

Reading between the lines: direct-to-consumer advertising of genetic testing in the USA.

S C Hull1, K Prasad.   

Abstract

This article critiques an advertisement in a theatre playbill by a bio-technology company for its commercial test for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic mutation, which may indicate a higher risk for breast and ovarian cancer. The advertisement targets a vulnerable audience attending a play about one woman's isolated and painful death from ovarian cancer. It promotes a product with incomplete and at times incorrect information, and it misguides women by suggesting that they contact the company directly about this test, rather than encouraging them to talk to their health care providers about genetic testing and their personal risk of breast cancer. In an era in which more genetic tests will be integrated into clinical practice, we can expect an increase in direct-to-consumer marketing for such tests. This advertisement is an example of what we need to be on guard against.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11765398     DOI: 10.1016/s0968-8080(01)90089-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Health Matters        ISSN: 0968-8080


  6 in total

Review 1.  Are genetic self-tests dangerous? Assessing the commercialization of genetic testing in terms of personal autonomy.

Authors:  Ludvig Beckman
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2004

2.  Health-related direct-to-consumer genetic tests: a public health assessment and analysis of practices related to Internet-based tests for risk of thrombosis.

Authors:  K A B Goddard; J Robitaille; N F Dowling; A R Parrado; J Fishman; L A Bradley; C A Moore; M J Khoury
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Factors associated with genetic counseling and BRCA testing in a population-based sample of young Black women with breast cancer.

Authors:  D Cragun; D Bonner; J Kim; M R Akbari; S A Narod; A Gomez-Fuego; J D Garcia; S T Vadaparampil; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Informed choice in direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT) websites: a content analysis of benefits, risks, and limitations.

Authors:  Amanda Singleton; Lori Hamby Erby; Kathryn V Foisie; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  A statewide survey of practitioners to assess knowledge and clinical practices regarding hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Tuya Pal; Deborah Cragun; Courtney Lewis; Andrea Doty; Maria Rodriguez; Cristi Radford; Zachary Thompson; Jongphil Kim; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2013-02-28

6.  Prevalence of the use of cancer related self-tests by members of the public: a community survey.

Authors:  Sue Wilson; Sheila Greenfield; Helen M Pattison; Angela Ryan; Richard J McManus; David Fitzmaurice; John Marriott; Cyril Chapman; Sue Clifford
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 4.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.