Literature DB >> 19026035

Glycopeptide bone penetration in patients with septic pseudoarthrosis of the tibia.

Silvia Garazzino1, Alessandro Aprato, Lorena Baietto, Antonio D'Avolio, Agostino Maiello, Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa, Domenico Aloj, Marco Siccardi, Antonio Biasibetti, Alessandro Massè, Giovanni Di Perri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: In the treatment of bone infections, a major determinant of the clinical response is the active drug concentration at the infected site. Because of the high prevalence of meticillin (methicillin)-resistant staphylococci and enterococci, glycopeptides are widely used for the treatment of bone and joint infections, but data on their penetration into human bone are lacking. The aim of our study was to measure vancomycin and teicoplanin concentrations in infected human bone under steady-state conditions and verify their relationship with inflammatory markers, patient demographic characteristics and pharmacodynamic microbiological markers. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Twenty-seven adult orthopaedic patients undergoing surgical debridement for septic pseudoarthrosis of the tibia and receiving either intravenous vancomycin (Vancocina) 1 g twice daily) or teicoplanin (Targosid) 10 mg/kg/day) were studied from January 2004 to January 2008. Plasma and bone specimens were simultaneously collected during surgery for pharmacokinetic and microbiological assays at a variable interval after antimicrobial administration. Bone samples were dissected into cortical and cancellous bone, cleaned of soft tissues, crushed and eluted into phosphate buffer. Necrotic samples and sequestra were not analysed.Plasma and bone antimicrobial concentrations were measured by a validated method of high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection, and bone/plasma concentration ratios were calculated. Cortical and cancellous bone area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) over 24 hours (AUC(24)) values were measured by the linear-log trapezoidal rule, using WinNonlin) software, and were compared with the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the infecting agents.
RESULTS: For vancomycin, the mean +/- SD concentrations were 2.66 +/- 1.2 mg/L in cortical bone and 11.53 +/- 7.8 mg/L in cancellous bone (corresponding to 20.67% and 89.39% of intraoperative plasma concentrations), and the mean +/- SD tissue AUC(24) values were 55.15 +/- 25.26 h . mg/L for cortical bone and 299.16 +/- 299.54 h . mg/L for cancellous bone. For teicoplanin, the mean +/- SD concentrations were 2.01 +/- 1.7 and 7.51 +/- 7.0 mg/L in cortical and cancellous bone, respectively (12.35% and 48.6% of intraoperative plasma concentrations), and the mean +/- SD teicoplanin tissue AUC(24) values were 34.08 +/- 23.6 h . mg/L and 155.17 +/- 132.8 h . mg/L for cortical bone and cancellous bone, respectively. The mean vancomycin AUC(24)/MIC ratios were 215.02 for plasma, 47.14 for cortical bone and 268.95 for cancellous bone. The mean teicoplanin AUC(24)/MIC ratios were 336.48, 36.27 and 197.21 for plasma, cortical bone and cancellous bone, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Bone penetration of both glycopeptides ranged from poor (<15%) to satisfactory (15-30%) in the cortical compartment, while it was far higher into the highly vascularized cancellous tissue. Vancomycin bone penetration was slightly higher than with teicoplanin, but the difference was not statistically significant. Higher bone concentrations were observed with higher inflammatory markers, possibly as a result of increased vascularization and vascular permeability under inflammatory conditions. Bone concentrations over the MIC and AUC/MIC ratios suggested that both glycopeptides achieve a satisfactory pharmacokinetic exposure in the cancellous bone, as far as Gram-positive pathogens are concerned. On the other hand, cortical bone exposure was suboptimal in most patients. Furthermore, as antimicrobial penetration may be affected by impaired blood supply, the role of radical surgical removal of purulent and necrotic tissues appears to be essential in order to shorten treatment duration and to reduce the risk of treatment failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19026035     DOI: 10.2165/0003088-200847120-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  27 in total

1.  Determination of levofloxacin in plasma, bronchoalveolar lavage and bone tissues by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection using a fully automated extraction method.

Authors:  S Djabarouti; E Boselli; B Allaouchiche; B Ba; A T Nguyen; J B Gordien; J M Bernadou; M C Saux; D Breilh
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2004-01-05       Impact factor: 3.205

2.  Regional and systemic prophylaxis with teicoplanin in total knee arthroplasty: a tissue penetration study.

Authors:  Luca Lazzarini; Andrea Novelli; Nicola Marzano; Lia Timillero; Stefania Fallani; Renato Viola; Fausto de Lalla
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 3.  [Diffusion in bone tissue of antibiotics].

Authors:  E Boselli; B Allaouchiche
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1999 Dec 18-25       Impact factor: 1.228

Review 4.  Pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial agents and rationale for their dosing.

Authors:  A P MacGowan; K E Bowker
Journal:  J Chemother       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.714

5.  Vancomycin concentrations in infected and noninfected human bone.

Authors:  A L Graziani; L A Lawson; G A Gibson; M A Steinberg; R R MacGregor
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Teicoplanin in cardiac surgery: intraoperative pharmacokinetics and concentrations in cardiac and mediastinal tissues.

Authors:  C Martin; P Bourget; M Alaya; A Sertin; C Atlani; K Ennabli; R Said
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin and other antimicrobials in patients with Staphylococcus aureus lower respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  Pamela A Moise-Broder; Alan Forrest; Mary C Birmingham; Jerome J Schentag
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  The concentration-independent effect of monoexponential and biexponential decay in vancomycin concentrations on the killing of Staphylococcus aureus under aerobic and anaerobic conditions.

Authors:  A J Larsson; K J Walker; J K Raddatz; J C Rotschafer
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Teicoplanin in the prevention of infection in total hip replacement.

Authors:  S Nehrer; F Thalhammer; E Schwameis; S Breyer; R Kotz
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 10.  The importance of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic surrogate markers to outcome. Focus on antibacterial agents.

Authors:  J M Hyatt; P S McKinnon; G S Zimmer; J J Schentag
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.447

View more
  12 in total

1.  Extended-duration dosing and distribution of dalbavancin into bone and articular tissue.

Authors:  Michael W Dunne; Sailaja Puttagunta; Craig R Sprenger; Chris Rubino; Scott Van Wart; James Baldassarre
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Increased temperature enhances the antimicrobial effects of daptomycin, vancomycin, tigecycline, fosfomycin, and cefamandole on staphylococcal biofilms.

Authors:  Stefan Hajdu; Johannes Holinka; Sonja Reichmann; Alexander M Hirschl; Wolfgang Graninger; Elisabeth Presterl
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in TKA treated with revision and direct intra-articular antibiotic infusion.

Authors:  Leo A Whiteside; Michael Peppers; Tariq A Nayfeh; Marcel E Roy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  FDG PET/CT is useful for the interim evaluation of response to therapy in patients affected by haematogenous spondylodiscitis.

Authors:  Cristina Nanni; Luca Boriani; Caterina Salvadori; Eleonora Zamparini; Giada Rorato; Valentina Ambrosini; Alessandro Gasbarrini; Fabio Tumietto; Francesco Cristini; Luigia Scudeller; Stefano Boriani; Pierluigi Viale; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Principles of Anti-infective Dosing.

Authors:  Nikolas J Onufrak; Alan Forrest; Daniel Gonzalez
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 6.  Acute infectious osteomyelitis in children: new treatment strategies for an old enemy.

Authors:  Sabrina Congedi; Chiara Minotti; Carlo Giaquinto; Liviana Da Dalt; Daniele Donà
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.764

7.  Successful salvage therapy with Daptomycin for osteomyelitis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a renal transplant recipient with Fabry-Anderson disease.

Authors:  Ennio Polilli; Tamara Ursini; Elena Mazzotta; Federica Sozio; Vincenzo Savini; Domenico D'Antonio; Michelino Barbato; Augusta Consorte; Giustino Parruti
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 3.944

8.  Efficacy of Single-stage Revision with Aggressive Debridement Using Intra-articular Antibiotics in the Treatment of Infected Joint Prosthesis.

Authors:  Suresh J Antony; Richard S Westbrook; John S Jackson; Jacob S Heydemann; Jenny L Nelson
Journal:  Infect Dis (Auckl)       Date:  2015-07-30

Review 9.  Rationale for one stage exchange of infected hip replacement using uncemented implants and antibiotic impregnated bone graft.

Authors:  Heinz Winkler
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Development of a Novel Model for the Assessment of Dead-Space Management in Soft Tissue.

Authors:  Rema A Oliver; Vedran Lovric; Yan Yu; Chris Christou; Sean S Aiken; John J Cooper; William R Walsh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.