Literature DB >> 9833102

Teicoplanin in the prevention of infection in total hip replacement.

S Nehrer1, F Thalhammer, E Schwameis, S Breyer, R Kotz.   

Abstract

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis has been shown to be effective in reducing postoperative wound infections. The rising incidence of infections secondary to methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus. S. epidermidis and S. enterococcal prompted us to administer Teicoplanin to infection in elective total joint arthroplasty. In 111 patients Teicoplanin was given in a single intravenous dose of 10 mg/kg prior to surgery. In the postoperative period no deep infection of the prosthetic device was found in a 14-month follow-up. In two patients the following organisms were isolated from superficial infections of the wound: S. epidermidis (methicillin-sensitive), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter sp. In no patient was revision surgery necessary. The serum concentration of Teicoplanin was within the therapeutic range during surgery, and tissue levels of Teicoplanin in cancellous (6.2 mg/kg, range 3.8-10.9 mg/kg) and cortical (7.1 mg/kg, range 2.6-12.1 mg/kg) bone during surgery in 16 patients exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration of 90% (MIC90) of methicillin-resistant strains reported for methicillin-resistant strains. In our experience a single dose regimen of Teicoplanin is a safe and effective method of antibiotic prophylaxis in hip joint replacement, particularly when methicillin-resistant bacteria are present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9833102     DOI: 10.1007/s004020050306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  7 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin.

Authors:  A P Wilson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Regional prophylaxis with teicoplanin in monolateral or bilateral total knee replacement: an open study.

Authors:  F de Lalla; R Viola; G Pellizzer; L Lazzarini; A Tramarin; P Fabris
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Supports used for positioning of patients in hip arthroplasty: is there an infection risk?

Authors:  Riaz Ahmad; Ji Tham; Syed Ghufran Ali Naqvi; Umer Butt; John Dixon
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Penetration of antibacterials into bone: pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and bioanalytical considerations.

Authors:  Cornelia B Landersdorfer; Jürgen B Bulitta; Martina Kinzig; Ulrike Holzgrabe; Fritz Sörgel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Strategy to control methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus post-operative infection in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  J C De Lucas-Villarrubia; M Lopez-Franco; J J Granizo; J C De Lucas-Garcia; E Gomez-Barrena
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Glycopeptide bone penetration in patients with septic pseudoarthrosis of the tibia.

Authors:  Silvia Garazzino; Alessandro Aprato; Lorena Baietto; Antonio D'Avolio; Agostino Maiello; Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa; Domenico Aloj; Marco Siccardi; Antonio Biasibetti; Alessandro Massè; Giovanni Di Perri
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Orthopaedic Implant-Associated Staphylococcal Infections: A Critical Reappraisal of Unmet Clinical Needs Associated with the Implementation of the Best Antibiotic Choice.

Authors:  Milo Gatti; Simona Barnini; Fabio Guarracino; Eva Maria Parisio; Michele Spinicci; Bruno Viaggi; Sara D'Arienzo; Silvia Forni; Angelo Galano; Fabrizio Gemmi
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.