Literature DB >> 7736689

The importance of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic surrogate markers to outcome. Focus on antibacterial agents.

J M Hyatt1, P S McKinnon, G S Zimmer, J J Schentag.   

Abstract

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic surrogate relationships have been used to describe the antibacterial activity of various classes of antimicrobial agents. Studies that have evaluated these relationships were reviewed to determine which of these surrogate markers were further dependent on antimicrobial class. The fluoroquinolone and aminoglycoside agents exhibit concentration-dependent killing. Studies have demonstrated that peak serum concentration: minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC): MIC ratios are important predictors of outcome for these antimicrobial agents. Area under the inhibitory concentration-time curve (AUIC24) [i.e. AUC24/MIC] is a useful parameter for describing efficacy for these agents, while an adequate peak concentration: MIC ratio seems necessary to prevent selection of resistant organisms. For beta-lactam antibiotics, the duration of time that the serum concentration exceeds the MIC (T > MIC) was the significant pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic surrogate in cases where the bacterial inoculum was low, or where very sensitive organisms were tested. However, in studies using more resistant organisms or larger inoculum sizes there is some concentration-dependence to the observed effect. Studies using reasonable dosage intervals have demonstrated covariance between T > MIC and AUC/MIC ratio for beta-lactam antibiotics. Since glycopeptide antibiotics display relatively slow but concentration-independent killing, and are cell wall active agents similar to beta-lactams, it has been presumed that T > MIC is the important pharmacokinetic surrogate related to efficacy for these agents. Some studies have shown that a concentration multiple of the MIC may be necessary for successful outcome with vancomycin. AUIC24 may prove to be an important pharmacokinetic surrogate if both time and concentration are indeed important parameters. To select an appropriate antimicrobial agent, the clinician must consider many patient-specific as well as organism-specific factors. Utilisation of known pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic surrogate relationships should help to optimise treatment outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7736689     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199528020-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  54 in total

1.  Mathematical examination of dual individualization principles (I): Relationships between AUC above MIC and area under the inhibitory curve for cefmenoxime, ciprofloxacin, and tobramycin.

Authors:  J J Schentag; D E Nix; M H Adelman
Journal:  DICP       Date:  1991-10

2.  Routine monitoring of serum vancomycin concentrations: waiting for proof of its value.

Authors:  D J Edwards; S Pancorbo
Journal:  Clin Pharm       Date:  1987-08

3.  Comparative study with enoxacin and netilmicin in a pharmacodynamic model to determine importance of ratio of antibiotic peak concentration to MIC for bactericidal activity and emergence of resistance.

Authors:  J Blaser; B B Stone; M C Groner; S H Zinner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  The association of aminoglycoside plasma levels with mortality in patients with gram-negative bacteremia.

Authors:  R D Moore; C R Smith; P S Lietman
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Ciprofloxacin in experimental Pseudomonas aeruginosa meningitis in rabbits.

Authors:  C J Hackbarth; H F Chambers; F Stella; A M Shibl; M A Sande
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Association of aminoglycoside plasma levels with therapeutic outcome in gram-negative pneumonia.

Authors:  R D Moore; C R Smith; P S Lietman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Efficacy of amikacin and ceftazidime in experimental aortic valve endocarditis due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  A S Bayer; D Norman; K S Kim
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Pharmacodynamics of a fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent in a neutropenic rat model of Pseudomonas sepsis.

Authors:  G L Drusano; D E Johnson; M Rosen; H C Standiford
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Activities of pefloxacin and ciprofloxacin in experimentally induced Pseudomonas pneumonia in neutropenic guinea pigs.

Authors:  F M Gordin; C J Hackbarth; K G Scott; M A Sande
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Potential impact of quantitative susceptibility tests on the design of aminoglycoside dosing regimens.

Authors:  J P McCormack; J J Schentag
Journal:  Drug Intell Clin Pharm       Date:  1987-02
View more
  95 in total

1.  In vitro and in vivo activities of amikacin, cefepime, amikacin plus cefepime, and imipenem against an SHV-5 extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae strain.

Authors:  D Szabó; A Máthé; Z Filetóth; P Anderlik; L Rókusz; F Rozgonyi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Achieving an optimal outcome in the treatment of infections. The role of clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antimicrobials.

Authors:  R C Li; M Zhu; J J Schentag
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Penetration of ciprofloxacin into the interstitial space of inflamed foot lesions in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients.

Authors:  M Müller; M Brunner; U Hollenstein; C Joukhadar; R Schmid; E Minar; H Ehringer; H G Eichler
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Influence of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Principles on Antibiotic Selection.

Authors:  George G. Zhanel
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.725

5.  Comparison of once-daily versus twice-daily administration of cefdinir against typical bacterial respiratory tract pathogens.

Authors:  G H Ross; L B Hovde; K H Ibrahim; Y H Ibrahim; J C Rotschafer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of linezolid following multiple oral doses.

Authors:  T Gee; R Ellis; G Marshall; J Andrews; J Ashby; R Wise
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Relevance of soft-tissue penetration by levofloxacin for target site bacterial killing in patients with sepsis.

Authors:  M A Zeitlinger; P Dehghanyar; B X Mayer; B S Schenk; U Neckel; G Heinz; A Georgopoulos; M Müller; C Joukhadar
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Issues in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anti-infective agents: kill curves versus MIC.

Authors:  Markus Mueller; Amparo de la Peña; Hartmut Derendorf
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and PK-PD integration of danofloxacin in sheep biological fluids.

Authors:  F Shojaee Aliabadi; M F Landoni; P Lees
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Ketolides--the modern relatives of macrolides : the pharmacokinetic perspective.

Authors:  Markus Zeitlinger; Claudia Christina Wagner; Birgit Heinisch
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.