Literature DB >> 19022948

Application of systematic review methodology to the field of nutrition.

Alice H Lichtenstein1, Elizabeth A Yetley, Joseph Lau.   

Abstract

Systematic reviews represent a rigorous and transparent approach to synthesizing scientific evidence that minimizes bias. They evolved within the medical community to support development of clinical and public health practice guidelines, set research agendas, and formulate scientific consensus statements. The use of systematic reviews for nutrition-related topics is more recent. Systematic reviews provide independently conducted comprehensive and objective assessments of available information addressing precise questions. This approach to summarizing available data is a useful tool for identifying the state of science including knowledge gaps and associated research needs, supporting development of science-based recommendations and guidelines, and serving as the foundation for updates as new data emerge. Our objective is to describe the steps for performing systematic reviews and highlight areas unique to the discipline of nutrition that are important to consider in data assessment. The steps involved in generating systematic reviews include identifying staffing and planning for outside expert input, forming a research team, developing an analytic framework, developing and refining research questions, defining eligibility criteria, identifying search terms, screening abstracts according to eligibility criteria, retrieving articles for evaluation, constructing evidence and summary tables, assessing methodological quality and applicability, and synthesizing results including performing meta-analysis, if appropriate. Unique and at times challenging, nutrition-related considerations include baseline nutrient exposure, nutrient status, bioequivalence of bioactive compounds, bioavailability, multiple and interrelated biological functions, undefined nature of some interventions, and uncertainties in intake assessment. Systematic reviews are a valuable and independent component of decision-making processes by groups responsible for developing science-based recommendations and policies.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19022948      PMCID: PMC3415860          DOI: 10.3945/jn.108.097154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  27 in total

Review 1.  Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses.

Authors:  D Moher; D J Cook; S Eastwood; I Olkin; D Rennie; D F Stroup
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-11-27       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Dietary reference intakes: vitamin A, vitamin K, arsenic, boron, chromium, copper, iodine, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, silicon, vanadium, and zinc.

Authors:  P Trumbo; A A Yates; S Schlicker; M Poos
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2001-03

3.  Developing an evidence-based Guide to Community Preventive Services--methods. The Task Force on Community Preventive Services.

Authors:  P A Briss; S Zaza; M Pappaioanou; J Fielding; L Wright-De Agüero; B I Truman; D P Hopkins; P D Mullen; R S Thompson; S H Woolf; V G Carande-Kulis; L Anderson; A R Hinman; D V McQueen; S M Teutsch; J R Harris
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids.

Authors:  Paula Trumbo; Sandra Schlicker; Allison A Yates; Mary Poos
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2002-11

5.  Users' guides to the medical literature. I. How to get started. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  A D Oxman; D L Sackett; G H Guyatt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-11-03       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.

Authors:  D F Stroup; J A Berlin; S C Morton; I Olkin; G D Williamson; D Rennie; D Moher; B J Becker; T A Sipe; S B Thacker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Dietary fat intake and prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review.

Authors:  L Hooper; C D Summerbell; J P Higgins; R L Thompson; N E Capps; G D Smith; R A Riemersma; S Ebrahim
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-31

Review 8.  Clinical practice guidelines: prevention of cytomegalovirus disease after renal transplantation.

Authors:  S V Jassal; J M Roscoe; J S Zaltzman; T Mazzulli; M Krajden; M Gadawski; D C Cattran; C J Cardella; S E Albert; E H Cole
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 10.121

9.  Overview of the conference "Vitamin D and Health in the 21st Century: an Update".

Authors:  Patsy M Brannon; Elizabeth A Yetley; Regan L Bailey; Mary Frances Picciano
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 10.  Recommendations for off-label use of intravenously administered immunoglobulin preparations. University Hospital Consortium Expert Panel for Off-Label Use of Polyvalent Intravenously Administered Immunoglobulin Preparations.

Authors:  T A Ratko; D A Burnett; G E Foulke; K A Matuszewski; R A Sacher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-06-21       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  23 in total

1.  Systematic review to support the development of nutrient reference intake values: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Mei Chung; Ethan M Balk; Stanley Ip; Jounghee Lee; Teruhiko Terasawa; Gowri Raman; Thomas Trikalinos; Alice H Lichtenstein; Joseph Lau
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 2.  Fruit and vegetable intake and bone health in women aged 45 years and over: a systematic review.

Authors:  M Hamidi; B A Boucher; A M Cheung; J Beyene; P S Shah
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Reporting of systematic reviews of micronutrients and health: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Mei Chung; Ethan M Balk; Stanley Ip; Gowri Raman; Winifred W Yu; Thomas A Trikalinos; Alice H Lichtenstein; Elizabeth A Yetley; Joseph Lau
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 4.  Quality of reviews on sugar-sweetened beverages and health outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Douglas L Weed; Michelle D Althuis; Pamela J Mink
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Dose-Response Relation between Tea Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Studies.

Authors:  Mei Chung; Naisi Zhao; Deena Wang; Marissa Shams-White; Micaela Karlsen; Aedín Cassidy; Mario Ferruzzi; Paul F Jacques; Elizabeth J Johnson; Taylor C Wallace
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 8.701

6.  Perspective: Network Meta-analysis Reaches Nutrition Research: Current Status, Scientific Concepts, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Lukas Schwingshackl; Guido Schwarzer; Gerta Rücker; Joerg J Meerpohl
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 7.  Vitamin D and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.

Authors:  J Mitri; M D Muraru; A G Pittas
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 8.  Options for basing Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) on chronic disease endpoints: report from a joint US-/Canadian-sponsored working group.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Yetley; Amanda J MacFarlane; Linda S Greene-Finestone; Cutberto Garza; Jamy D Ard; Stephanie A Atkinson; Dennis M Bier; Alicia L Carriquiry; William R Harlan; Dale Hattis; Janet C King; Daniel Krewski; Deborah L O'Connor; Ross L Prentice; Joseph V Rodricks; George A Wells
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 9.  Parental involvement in interventions to improve child dietary intake: a systematic review.

Authors:  Melanie D Hingle; Teresia M O'Connor; Jayna M Dave; Tom Baranowski
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 10.  Systematic review: Vitamin D and cardiometabolic outcomes.

Authors:  Anastassios G Pittas; Mei Chung; Thomas Trikalinos; Joanna Mitri; Michael Brendel; Kamal Patel; Alice H Lichtenstein; Joseph Lau; Ethan M Balk
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.