OBJECTIVE: Interventions that aim to improve child dietary quality and reduce disease risk often involve parents. The most effective methods to engage parents remain unclear. A systematic review of interventions designed to change child and adolescent dietary behavior was conducted to answer whether parent involvement enhanced intervention effectiveness, and what type of involvement was most effective in achieving desired outcomes. METHOD: In 2008, Pub Med, Medline, Psych Info, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify programs designed to change child and adolescent dietary intake that also involved parents. Methods of parental involvement were categorized based on the type and intensity of parental involvement. These methods were compared against intervention design, dietary outcomes, and quality of reporting (evaluated using CONSORT checklist) for each study. RESULTS: The literature search identified 1774 articles and 24 met review criteria. Four studies systematically evaluated parent involvement with inconsistent results. Indirect methods to engage parents were most commonly used, although direct approaches were more likely to result in positive outcomes. Four studies met >70% of CONSORT items. CONCLUSION: Limited conclusions may be drawn regarding the best method to involve parents in changing child diet to promote health. However, direct methods show promise and warrant further research. Copyright 2010 The Institute For Cancer Prevention. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: Interventions that aim to improve child dietary quality and reduce disease risk often involve parents. The most effective methods to engage parents remain unclear. A systematic review of interventions designed to change child and adolescent dietary behavior was conducted to answer whether parent involvement enhanced intervention effectiveness, and what type of involvement was most effective in achieving desired outcomes. METHOD: In 2008, Pub Med, Medline, Psych Info, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify programs designed to change child and adolescent dietary intake that also involved parents. Methods of parental involvement were categorized based on the type and intensity of parental involvement. These methods were compared against intervention design, dietary outcomes, and quality of reporting (evaluated using CONSORT checklist) for each study. RESULTS: The literature search identified 1774 articles and 24 met review criteria. Four studies systematically evaluated parent involvement with inconsistent results. Indirect methods to engage parents were most commonly used, although direct approaches were more likely to result in positive outcomes. Four studies met >70% of CONSORT items. CONCLUSION: Limited conclusions may be drawn regarding the best method to involve parents in changing child diet to promote health. However, direct methods show promise and warrant further research. Copyright 2010 The Institute For Cancer Prevention. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Marian L Fitzgibbon; Melinda R Stolley; Linda Schiffer; Linda Van Horn; Katherine KauferChristoffel; Alan Dyer Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Debra Haire-Joshu; Michael B Elliott; Nicole M Caito; Kimberly Hessler; M S Nanney; Nancy Hale; Tegan K Boehmer; Matthew Kreuter; Ross C Brownson Journal: Prev Med Date: 2008-04-09 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Wendy Van Lippevelde; Maïté Verloigne; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Mona Bjelland; Nanna Lien; Juan M Fernández-Alvira; Luis A Moreno; Eva Kovacs; Johannes Brug; Lea Maes Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-11-23 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Philip J Morgan; Myles D Young; Adam B Lloyd; Monica L Wang; Narelle Eather; Andrew Miller; Elaine M Murtagh; Alyce T Barnes; Sherry L Pagoto Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Violet Siwik; Randa Kutob; Cheryl Ritenbaugh; Luis Cruz; Janet Senf; Mikel Aickin; Scott Going; Andrew Shatte Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2013 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Margaret Raber; Maria C Swartz; Diane Santa Maria; Teresia O'Connor; Tom Baranowski; Rhea Li; Joya Chandra Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2016-04-11 Impact factor: 3.756