BACKGROUND: Vitamin D may modify risk for cardiometabolic outcomes (type 2 diabetes, hypertension, or cardiovascular disease). PURPOSE: To examine the association between vitamin D status, including the effect of vitamin D supplementation, and cardiometabolic outcomes in generally healthy adults. DATA SOURCES: English-language studies in MEDLINE (inception to 4 November 2009) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (fourth quarter of 2009). STUDY SELECTION: 11 reviewers screened citations to identify longitudinal cohort studies that reported associations between vitamin D status and cardiometabolic outcomes, including randomized trials of vitamin D supplementation. DATA EXTRACTION: 5 independent reviewers extracted data about study conduct, participant characteristics, outcomes, and quality. Differences were resolved by consensus. DATA SYNTHESIS: 13 observational studies (14 cohorts) and 18 trials were eligible. Three of 6 analyses (from 4 different cohorts) reported a lower incident diabetes risk in the highest versus the lowest vitamin D status groups. Eight trials found no effect of vitamin D supplementation on glycemia or incident diabetes. In meta-analysis of 3 cohorts, lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration was associated with incident hypertension (relative risk, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.3 to 2.4]). In meta-analyses of 10 trials, supplementation nonsignificantly reduced systolic blood pressure (weighted mean difference, -1.9 mm Hg [CI, -4.2 to 0.4 mm Hg]) and did not affect diastolic blood pressure (weighted mean difference, -0.1 mm Hg [CI, -0.7 to 0.5 mm Hg]). Lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration was associated with incident cardiovascular disease in 5 of 7 analyses (6 cohorts). Four trials found no effect of supplementation on cardiovascular outcomes. LIMITATIONS: Studies included primarily white participants. Observational studies were heterogeneous. Several trials reported post hoc analyses. CONCLUSION: The association between vitamin D status and cardiometabolic outcomes is uncertain. Trials showed no clinically significant effect of vitamin D supplementation at the dosages given. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease, the National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and Public Health Agency of Canada.
BACKGROUND:Vitamin D may modify risk for cardiometabolic outcomes (type 2 diabetes, hypertension, or cardiovascular disease). PURPOSE: To examine the association between vitamin D status, including the effect of vitamin D supplementation, and cardiometabolic outcomes in generally healthy adults. DATA SOURCES: English-language studies in MEDLINE (inception to 4 November 2009) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (fourth quarter of 2009). STUDY SELECTION: 11 reviewers screened citations to identify longitudinal cohort studies that reported associations between vitamin D status and cardiometabolic outcomes, including randomized trials of vitamin D supplementation. DATA EXTRACTION: 5 independent reviewers extracted data about study conduct, participant characteristics, outcomes, and quality. Differences were resolved by consensus. DATA SYNTHESIS: 13 observational studies (14 cohorts) and 18 trials were eligible. Three of 6 analyses (from 4 different cohorts) reported a lower incident diabetes risk in the highest versus the lowest vitamin D status groups. Eight trials found no effect of vitamin D supplementation on glycemia or incident diabetes. In meta-analysis of 3 cohorts, lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration was associated with incident hypertension (relative risk, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.3 to 2.4]). In meta-analyses of 10 trials, supplementation nonsignificantly reduced systolic blood pressure (weighted mean difference, -1.9 mm Hg [CI, -4.2 to 0.4 mm Hg]) and did not affect diastolic blood pressure (weighted mean difference, -0.1 mm Hg [CI, -0.7 to 0.5 mm Hg]). Lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration was associated with incident cardiovascular disease in 5 of 7 analyses (6 cohorts). Four trials found no effect of supplementation on cardiovascular outcomes. LIMITATIONS: Studies included primarily white participants. Observational studies were heterogeneous. Several trials reported post hoc analyses. CONCLUSION: The association between vitamin D status and cardiometabolic outcomes is uncertain. Trials showed no clinically significant effect of vitamin D supplementation at the dosages given. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease, the National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and Public Health Agency of Canada.
Authors: Stefanie S Schleithoff; Armin Zittermann; Gero Tenderich; Heiner K Berthold; Peter Stehle; Reiner Koerfer Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Carrie W Nemerovski; Michael P Dorsch; Robert U Simpson; Henry G Bone; Keith D Aaronson; Barry E Bleske Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 4.705
Authors: Macarius M Donneyong; Carlton A Hornung; Kira C Taylor; Richard N Baumgartner; John A Myers; Charles B Eaton; Eiran Z Gorodeski; Liviu Klein; Lisa W Martin; James M Shikany; Yiqing Song; Wenjun Li; JoAnn E Manson Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Candace Y Parker-Autry; Alayne D Markland; Alicia C Ballard; Deidra Downs-Gunn; Holly E Richter Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Olena Andrukhova; Svetlana Slavic; Ute Zeitz; Sabine C Riesen; Monika S Heppelmann; Tamas D Ambrisko; Mato Markovic; Wolfgang M Kuebler; Reinhold G Erben Journal: Mol Endocrinol Date: 2013-01-01