Literature DB >> 19020921

Differences in persistence among different weekly oral bisphosphonate medications.

O Sheehy1, C M Kindundu, M Barbeau, J LeLorier.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: We evaluated the differences in persistence with weekly oral bisphosphonate therapy according to the initial drug. Persistence to weekly oral preparations remains suboptimal, particularly in patients who receive generic alendronate. Alternative solutions are needed to improve the real life effectiveness of osteoporosis therapies.
INTRODUCTION: Poor persistence is widespread with oral osteoporosis (OP) therapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the persistence among OP patients started on weekly oral bisphosphonates (BP).
METHODS: Patients newly initiated on branded risedronate, branded alendronate, or generic alendronate once weekly were selected from the Régie de l'Assurance Maladie du Québec databases. The cohort included patients with and without a previous OP fracture. The probability and the risk factors for early discontinuation were estimated using Cox regression models.
RESULTS: The study cohort included 32,804 patients. After 1 year, a significant difference in persistence on oral BP therapy was found. The patients started on branded risedronate were 11% more likely to stop OP therapy than patients started on branded alendronate. Risk of discontinuation doubled in patients initiated with generic alendronate compared to patients started on branded alendronate. Male gender was associated with a 25% increase risk of early discontinuation. No statistical association was found between previous OP fracture and early discontinuation.
CONCLUSION: This study provides further evidence of poor persistence to newly initiated oral weekly BP therapies, particularly for the patients started on generic alendronate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19020921     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-008-0795-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  38 in total

1.  Using medical services claims to assess injuries in the elderly: sensitivity of diagnostic and procedure codes for injury ascertainment.

Authors:  R Tamblyn; T Reid; N Mayo; P McLeod; M Churchill-Smith
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  A chronic disease score from automated pharmacy data.

Authors:  M Von Korff; E H Wagner; K Saunders
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  In vitro and in vivo equivalence studies of alendronate monosodium tablets.

Authors:  Emilio José Antonio Roldán; Oscar Quattrocchi; Daniel Zanetti; Enrique Piccinni; José Tessler; Liliana Edith Caballero; Aníbal Pérez Lloret
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  2005

4.  Determinants of persistence with bisphosphonates: a study in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Fernie J A Penning-van Beest; Wim G Goettsch; Joëlle A Erkens; Ron M C Herings
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.393

5.  The effect of dosing frequency on compliance and persistence with bisphosphonate therapy in postmenopausal women: a comparison of studies in the United States, the United Kingdom, and France.

Authors:  Joyce A Cramer; Niall O Lynch; Anne-Francoise Gaudin; Mel Walker; Warren Cowell
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.393

6.  Comparative in vitro study of oesophageal adhesiveness of different commercial formulations containing alendronate.

Authors:  Monjed Shakweh; Irene Bravo-Osuna; Gilles Ponchel
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2007-04-08       Impact factor: 4.384

Review 7.  Alendronate and risedronate: what you need to know about their upper gastrointestinal tract toxicity.

Authors:  Danial E Baker
Journal:  Rev Gastroenterol Disord       Date:  2002

8.  Compliance with pharmacologic therapy for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Robert A Yood; Srinivas Emani; John I Reed; Barbara Edelman Lewis; Mary Charpentier; Eva Lydick
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Use of NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors, and acetaminophen and associated coprescriptions of gastroprotective agents in an elderly population.

Authors:  Elham Rahme; Michael A Marentette; Sheldon X Kong; Jacques Lelorier
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2002-12-15

10.  Compliance and satisfaction with raloxifene versus alendronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in clinical practice: An open-label, prospective, nonrandomized, observational study.

Authors:  Carmen Turbí; Gabriel Herrero-Beaumont; Juan Carlos Acebes; Antonio Torrijos; Jenaro Graña; Roberto Miguélez; JoséAntonio Sacristán; Fernando Marín
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.393

View more
  18 in total

1.  Patterns of use for brand-name versus generic oral bisphosphonate drugs in Ontario over a 13-year period: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Lisa-Ann Fraser; Jordan M Albaum; Mina Tadrous; Andrea M Burden; Salimah Z Shariff; Suzanne M Cadarette
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-01-13

2.  Adverse events, bone mineral density and discontinuation associated with generic alendronate among postmenopausal women previously tolerant of brand alendronate: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Daniel T Grima; Alexandra Papaioannou; Parisa Airia; George Ioannidis; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 3.  A systematic review of factors affecting medication adherence among patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  C T Yeam; S Chia; H C C Tan; Y H Kwan; W Fong; J J B Seng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  The association between automatic generic substitution and treatment persistence with oral bisphosphonates.

Authors:  O Ström; E Landfeldt
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Cost effectiveness of denosumab compared with oral bisphosphonates in the treatment of post-menopausal osteoporotic women in Belgium.

Authors:  Mickaël Hiligsmann; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Patient-reported reasons for nonadherence to recommended osteoporosis pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  Sylvie F Hall; Stephanie W Edmonds; Yiyue Lou; Peter Cram; Douglas W Roblin; Kenneth G Saag; Nicole C Wright; Michael P Jones; Fredric D Wolinsky
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2017-06-08

Review 7.  Safety of long-term bisphosphonate therapy for the management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Cost-effective intervention thresholds against osteoporotic fractures based on FRAX® in Switzerland.

Authors:  K Lippuner; H Johansson; F Borgström; J A Kanis; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Bisphosphonate use and risk of post-operative fracture among patients undergoing a total knee replacement for knee osteoarthritis: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  D Prieto-Alhambra; M K Javaid; A Judge; J Maskell; A Kiran; C Cooper; N K Arden
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Persistence with osteoporosis medication among newly-treated osteoporotic patients.

Authors:  Job F M van Boven; Pieter T de Boer; Maarten J Postma; Stefan Vegter
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.