Literature DB >> 22120909

The association between automatic generic substitution and treatment persistence with oral bisphosphonates.

O Ström1, E Landfeldt.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Automatic generic substitution of alendronate products, used to reduce drug costs, and medication persistence was studied retrospectively between 2006 and 2009. During this period the number of, and the rate of substitution between, alendronate products increased while persistence decreased. Patient preferences should be considered when designing and evaluating generic policies.
INTRODUCTION: Automatic generic substitution (AGS) was implemented in Sweden in 2002. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between AGS and persistence with alendronate treatment of primary osteoporosis in Sweden.
METHODS: An open historical cohort of women and men (n = 36,433) was identified in the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register through filled prescriptions for alendronate or risedronate between 2005 and 2009. Co-morbidity data was extracted from the National Patient Register. The association between AGS and medication persistence was investigated using non-parametric and parametric survival analysis.
RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2009, the number of alendronate products increased from 15 to 25, the proportion of prescriptions constituting a substitution increased from 10.8% to 45.2%, and the proportion of patients persisting with alendronate treatment for 12 months fell from 66.9% to 51.7%. Patients starting alendronate treatment in 2006 had lower risk of stopping treatment compared with those starting in 2007 (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.29-1.39), 2008 (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.43-1.55), and 2009 (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.40-1.60). No difference was observed in persistence with proprietary risedronate during the same period. Individuals who had their alendronate product substituted at the first prescription refill had significantly higher probability of discontinuation (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.20-1.30).
CONCLUSION: AGS causes increased product substitution which appears to be associated with reduced treatment persistence. Poor health outcomes and associated costs due to forgone drug exposure should be taken into account in the design and evaluation of policies implemented to encourage utilisation of generic medicines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22120909     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1850-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  20 in total

1.  Physicians' opinions and experiences of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Reform.

Authors:  Karolina Andersson; Tove Jörgensen; Anders Carlsten
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Incorporating adherence into health economic modelling of osteoporosis.

Authors:  O Ström; F Borgström; J A Kanis; B Jönsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Brand versus generic alendronate: gastrointestinal effects measured by resource utilization.

Authors:  Hillel Halkin; Marina Dushenat; Barbara Silverman; Varda Shalev; Ronen Loebstein; Yosef Lomnicky; Nurit Friedman
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 3.154

4.  Patients' beliefs about prescribed medicines and their role in adherence to treatment in chronic physical illness.

Authors:  R Horne; J Weinman
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  The societal burden of poor persistence to treatment of osteoporosis in Sweden.

Authors:  Erik Landfeldt; Jonas Lundkvist; Oskar Ström
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  The effect of dosing frequency on compliance and persistence with bisphosphonate therapy in postmenopausal women: a comparison of studies in the United States, the United Kingdom, and France.

Authors:  Joyce A Cramer; Niall O Lynch; Anne-Francoise Gaudin; Mel Walker; Warren Cowell
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.393

7.  Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Patricia Halfon; Andrew Fong; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Christophe Luthi; L Duncan Saunders; Cynthia A Beck; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Generic and therapeutic substitutions in the UK: are they a good thing?

Authors:  Martin G Duerden; Dyfrig A Hughes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Comparative in vitro study of oesophageal adhesiveness of different commercial formulations containing alendronate.

Authors:  Monjed Shakweh; Irene Bravo-Osuna; Gilles Ponchel
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2007-04-08       Impact factor: 4.384

10.  Differences in persistence among different weekly oral bisphosphonate medications.

Authors:  O Sheehy; C M Kindundu; M Barbeau; J LeLorier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  15 in total

1.  Patterns of use for brand-name versus generic oral bisphosphonate drugs in Ontario over a 13-year period: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Lisa-Ann Fraser; Jordan M Albaum; Mina Tadrous; Andrea M Burden; Salimah Z Shariff; Suzanne M Cadarette
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-01-13

Review 2.  A systematic review of factors affecting medication adherence among patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  C T Yeam; S Chia; H C C Tan; Y H Kwan; W Fong; J J B Seng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Anti-osteoporotic treatments in France: initiation, persistence and switches over 6 years of follow-up.

Authors:  M Belhassen; C B Confavreux; B Cortet; L Lamezec; M Ginoux; E Van Ganse
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Associations between generic substitution and patients' attitudes, beliefs and experiences.

Authors:  Jette Rathe; Pia Larsen; Morten Andersen; Maja Paulsen; Dorte Jarbøl; Janus Thomsen; Jens Soendergaard
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Persistence with osteoporosis medication among newly-treated osteoporotic patients.

Authors:  Job F M van Boven; Pieter T de Boer; Maarten J Postma; Stefan Vegter
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Bisphosphonates adherence for treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Helena Parente Vieira; Ingrid Almeida Leite; Thayga Maria Araújo Sampaio; Juliane Dos Anjos de Paula; Ankilma do Nascimento Andrade; Luiz Carlos de Abreu; Vitor E Valenti; Flavia C Goulart; Fernando Adami
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2013-05-24

7.  Comparative effectiveness and costs of generic and brand-name gabapentin and venlafaxine in patients with neuropathic pain or generalized anxiety disorder in Spain.

Authors:  Antoni Sicras-Mainar; Javier Rejas-Gutiérrez; Ruth Navarro-Artieda
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2015-06-04

Review 8.  A critical review of brand and generic alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Jacques P Brown; Kenneth S Davison; Wojciech P Olszynski; Karen A Beattie; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-10-21

Review 9.  The Impact of Generic Substitution on Health and Economic Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  H Gothe; I Schall; K Saverno; M Mitrovic; A Luzak; D Brixner; U Siebert
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.561

10.  Persistence with denosumab and persistence with oral bisphosphonates for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a retrospective, observational study, and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Karlsson; J Lundkvist; E Psachoulia; M Intorcia; O Ström
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.