Literature DB >> 20388226

Adverse events, bone mineral density and discontinuation associated with generic alendronate among postmenopausal women previously tolerant of brand alendronate: a retrospective cohort study.

Daniel T Grima1, Alexandra Papaioannou, Parisa Airia, George Ioannidis, Jonathan D Adachi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A rise in gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs) and a decline in bone mineral density (BMD) was observed in patients previously tolerant to brand alendronate shortly after generic versions were introduced in July 2005 to the Canadian market. The objective of our study was to quantify changes in AE rates and BMD scores, as well as associated alendronate discontinuation among patients before and after switch from brand to generic alendronate.
METHODS: A chart review of postmenopausal women 50 years of age and older between 2003 and 2007 was conducted in two specialized tertiary care referral centers. Patients on alendronate both before and after July 2005 were included. The change in the number of AEs, changes in BMD and associated alendronate discontinuation was compared before and after the switch from brand to generic alendronate.
RESULTS: 301 women with an average age of 67.6 years (standard deviation (SD) = 9.5) had a total of 47 AEs between July 2003 and December 2007 that resulted in discontinuation of the medication. There was a significant increase in the rate of AEs per patient-months-at-risk from 0.0001 before to 0.0044 after October 2005 (p < 0.001). The most common AEs were GI in nature (stomach pain, GI upset, nausea, and reflux). In addition, 23 patients discontinued alendronate due to BMD reduction after January 2006. In these patients, BMD scores were significantly reduced from their prior BMD measures (change of -0.0534, p < 0.001 for spine BMD and change of -0.0338, p = 0.01 for femur BMD). Among patients who discontinued due to BMD reduction, BMD was stable in the period prior to January 2006 (change of -0.0066, p = 0.5 for spine BMD and change of 0.0011, p = 0.9 for femur BMD); however, testing for reduction after January 2006 in BMD measures (one-sided T-test) revealed there was a significant reduction in BMD scores for both anatomic sites (change of -0.0321, p = .005 for spine, change of -0.0205, p = 0.05 for femur).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who were previously stable on doses of brand alendronate experienced an increase in AEs causing discontinuation after introduction of automatic substitution to generic alendronate. In addition, reductions in BMD were observed in some patients who had stable BMDs before January 2006. Given the substantial increase in AEs, generic alendronate may not be as well tolerated as brand alendronate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20388226      PMCID: PMC2867835          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-68

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  21 in total

Review 1.  Adverse effects of bisphosphonates. A comparative review.

Authors:  S Adami; N Zamberlan
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Absorption of oral diphosphonate in normal subjects.

Authors:  I Fogelman; L Smith; R Mazess; M A Wilson; J A Bevan
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.478

Review 3.  Oral bisphosphonates and upper gastrointestinal tract problems: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Byron Cryer; Douglas C Bauer
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Alendronate for osteoporosis. Safe and efficacious nonhormonal therapy.

Authors:  J D Adachi
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group.

Authors:  D M Black; S R Cummings; D B Karpf; J A Cauley; D E Thompson; M C Nevitt; D C Bauer; H K Genant; W L Haskell; R Marcus; S M Ott; J C Torner; S A Quandt; T F Reiss; K E Ensrud
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-12-07       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Disintegration/dissolution profiles of copies of Fosamax (alendronate).

Authors:  S Epstein; B Cryer; S Ragi; J R Zanchetta; J Walliser; J Chow; M A Johnson; A E Leyes
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.580

7.  Effect of oral alendronate on bone mineral density and the incidence of fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis. The Alendronate Phase III Osteoporosis Treatment Study Group.

Authors:  U A Liberman; S R Weiss; J Bröll; H W Minne; H Quan; N H Bell; J Rodriguez-Portales; R W Downs; J Dequeker; M Favus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-11-30       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Differences in persistence, safety and efficacy of generic and original branded once weekly bisphosphonates in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis: 1-year results of a retrospective patient chart review analysis.

Authors:  Johann D Ringe; Gerd Möller
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.631

9.  Differences in persistence among different weekly oral bisphosphonate medications.

Authors:  O Sheehy; C M Kindundu; M Barbeau; J LeLorier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  The osteoporosis care gap in Canada.

Authors:  A Papaioannou; L Giangregorio; B Kvern; P Boulos; G Ioannidis; J D Adachi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  10 in total

1.  The association between automatic generic substitution and treatment persistence with oral bisphosphonates.

Authors:  O Ström; E Landfeldt
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Safety of long-term bisphosphonate therapy for the management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  A drinkable formulation of alendronate: potential to increase compliance and decrease upper GI irritation.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Brandi; Dennis Black
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2013-09

4.  If you don't take it - it can't work: the consequences of not being treated or nonadherence to osteoporosis therapy.

Authors:  Jonathan D Adachi; Robert G Josse; R Graham G Russell
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 5.  A critical review of brand and generic alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Jacques P Brown; Kenneth S Davison; Wojciech P Olszynski; Karen A Beattie; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-10-21

6.  Comparing tolerability and efficacy of generic versus brand alendronate: a randomized clinical study in postmenopausal women with a recent fracture.

Authors:  Joop P W van den Bergh; Marian E Bouts; Eveline van der Veer; Robert Y van der Velde; Marcel J W Janssen; Piet P Geusens; Bjorn Winkens; Nico J J Oldenhof; Tineke A C M van Geel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Differences in In Vitro Disintegration Time among Canadian Brand and Generic Bisphosphonates.

Authors:  Wojciech P Olszynski; Jonathan D Adachi; K Shawn Davison
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2014-10-02

Review 8.  Challenges in implementing and maintaining osteoporosis therapy.

Authors:  Ankita Modi; Shiva Sajjan; Sampada Gandhi
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-08-13

Review 9.  Alendronate prevents glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in patients with rheumatic diseases: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shun-Li Kan; Zhi-Fang Yuan; Yan Li; Jie Ai; Hong Xu; Jing-Cheng Sun; Shi-Qing Feng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Randomized clinical trial comparing efficacy and safety of brand versus generic alendronate (Bonmax®) for osteoporosis treatment.

Authors:  Aasis Unnanuntana; Atthakorn Jarusriwanna; Panupan Songcharoen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.