Literature DB >> 17576054

Comparative in vitro study of oesophageal adhesiveness of different commercial formulations containing alendronate.

Monjed Shakweh1, Irene Bravo-Osuna, Gilles Ponchel.   

Abstract

Cases of oesophageal irritation have been reported in patients ingesting alendronate with little liquid or reclining shortly after taking the medication. Pill-induced oesophagitis principally occurs because of adherence of ingested tablets to the epithelial surface. The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the oesophageal bioadhesive characteristics of alendronate generics marketed in Europe, the proprietary Fosamax((R)), one negative and two positive polymer controls. A texture analyser was used for qualitative analysis and to determine the maximal detachment force and the adhesion work developed by each formulation on porcine oesophageal mucosa. Fosamax showed few or no bioadhesive characteristics, but the detachment of few tablets powder particles in some of the experiments does not preclude the potential risk of oesophageal lesions. The 10-mg generic Teva tablets had bioadhesive characteristics similar to a positive control. Other generic formulations (Alenat, Stada, Aliud, Ratiopharm showed "cleavage" rupture, leaving a large piece of the tablet mass attached to the mucosa. The bioadhesive characteristics seem to be related to the inactive ingredients: the presence of adhesive polymers such as HPC or very active disintegration agents, such as sodium croscarmellose. The demonstrated differences in adhesiveness suggest that differences in oesophageal tolerance between Fosamax tablets and generics of sodium alendronate may exist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17576054     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2007.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0928-0987            Impact factor:   4.384


  8 in total

1.  Adverse events, bone mineral density and discontinuation associated with generic alendronate among postmenopausal women previously tolerant of brand alendronate: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Daniel T Grima; Alexandra Papaioannou; Parisa Airia; George Ioannidis; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  The association between automatic generic substitution and treatment persistence with oral bisphosphonates.

Authors:  O Ström; E Landfeldt
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Safety of long-term bisphosphonate therapy for the management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis: insights for clinicians.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Differences in persistence among different weekly oral bisphosphonate medications.

Authors:  O Sheehy; C M Kindundu; M Barbeau; J LeLorier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  A reappraisal of generic bisphosphonates in osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; J-Y Reginster; J-M Kaufman; J-D Ringe; J D Adachi; M Hiligsmann; R Rizzoli; C Cooper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  A critical review of brand and generic alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Jacques P Brown; Kenneth S Davison; Wojciech P Olszynski; Karen A Beattie; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-10-21

8.  Differences in In Vitro Disintegration Time among Canadian Brand and Generic Bisphosphonates.

Authors:  Wojciech P Olszynski; Jonathan D Adachi; K Shawn Davison
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2014-10-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.