| Literature DB >> 19014443 |
Adam Skinner1, Michael S Y Lee, Mark N Hutchinson.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Australian scincid clade Lerista provides perhaps the best available model for studying limb reduction in squamates (lizards and snakes), comprising more than 75 species displaying a remarkable variety of digit configurations, from pentadactyl to entirely limbless conditions. We investigated the pattern and rate of limb reduction and loss in Lerista, employing a comprehensive phylogeny inferred from nucleotide sequences for a nuclear intron and six mitochondrial genes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 19014443 PMCID: PMC2596130 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-310
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Majority-rule consensus of 5000 trees sampled after attaining stationarity in a Bayesian analysis of nucleotide sequences for 72 species of Mean branch lengths from the Bayesian analysis have been modified via penalised likelihood rate smoothing to produce an ultrametric tree. Posterior probabilities ≥ 0.50 followed by maximum likelihood numbers of digits for the manus and pes are shown adjacent to internal nodes. Ancestral states for the manus were reconstructed assuming maximum likelihood rates of digit gain and loss; for the pes, ancestral states are those inferred assuming the maximum likelihood rate of digit loss and rates of digit gain of 0.020–0.025 (see text). Alternative numbers of pedal digits yielding a log-likelihood within two units of the optimal value (i.e., that for the maximum likelihood estimate) are presented in parentheses for ancestral digit configurations not observed among nominal species of Lerista. Modal digit configurations follow species names. Branches are coloured according to digit configuration: dark blue, 5, 5; light blue, 4, 4; light blue-green, 3, 3; green, 2, 3; light yellow-green, 2, 2; yellow, 1, 3 and 1, 2; light orange, 0, 2; dark orange, 0, 1; red, 0, 0.
Figure 2Numbers of manual and pedal digits lost in all inferred reductions from a pentadactyl or tetradactyl condition. Each point represents the number of manual or pedal digits initially lost by an inferred pentadactyl or tetradactyl ancestor; subsequent reductions (e.g., from a tridactyl condition produced as a consequence of the initial reduction) are not presented. 'Total number of digits lost' is the number of manual and pedal digits lost in an inferred reduction. Note the overlapping symbols at (2, 1) and (4, 2).