R Alexander Pyron1, Frank T Burbrink, John J Wiens. 1. Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, 2023 G St. NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA. rpyron@colubroid.org
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The extant squamates (>9400 known species of lizards and snakes) are one of the most diverse and conspicuous radiations of terrestrial vertebrates, but no studies have attempted to reconstruct a phylogeny for the group with large-scale taxon sampling. Such an estimate is invaluable for comparative evolutionary studies, and to address their classification. Here, we present the first large-scale phylogenetic estimate for Squamata. RESULTS: The estimated phylogeny contains 4161 species, representing all currently recognized families and subfamilies. The analysis is based on up to 12896 base pairs of sequence data per species (average = 2497 bp) from 12 genes, including seven nuclear loci (BDNF, c-mos, NT3, PDC, R35, RAG-1, and RAG-2), and five mitochondrial genes (12S, 16S, cytochrome b, ND2, and ND4). The tree provides important confirmation for recent estimates of higher-level squamate phylogeny based on molecular data (but with more limited taxon sampling), estimates that are very different from previous morphology-based hypotheses. The tree also includes many relationships that differ from previous molecular estimates and many that differ from traditional taxonomy. CONCLUSIONS: We present a new large-scale phylogeny of squamate reptiles that should be a valuable resource for future comparative studies. We also present a revised classification of squamates at the family and subfamily level to bring the taxonomy more in line with the new phylogenetic hypothesis. This classification includes new, resurrected, and modified subfamilies within gymnophthalmid and scincid lizards, and boid, colubrid, and lamprophiid snakes.
BACKGROUND: The extant squamates (>9400 known species of lizards and snakes) are one of the most diverse and conspicuous radiations of terrestrial vertebrates, but no studies have attempted to reconstruct a phylogeny for the group with large-scale taxon sampling. Such an estimate is invaluable for comparative evolutionary studies, and to address their classification. Here, we present the first large-scale phylogenetic estimate for Squamata. RESULTS: The estimated phylogeny contains 4161 species, representing all currently recognized families and subfamilies. The analysis is based on up to 12896 base pairs of sequence data per species (average = 2497 bp) from 12 genes, including seven nuclear loci (BDNF, c-mos, NT3, PDC, R35, RAG-1, and RAG-2), and five mitochondrial genes (12S, 16S, cytochrome b, ND2, and ND4). The tree provides important confirmation for recent estimates of higher-level squamate phylogeny based on molecular data (but with more limited taxon sampling), estimates that are very different from previous morphology-based hypotheses. The tree also includes many relationships that differ from previous molecular estimates and many that differ from traditional taxonomy. CONCLUSIONS: We present a new large-scale phylogeny of squamate reptiles that should be a valuable resource for future comparative studies. We also present a revised classification of squamates at the family and subfamily level to bring the taxonomy more in line with the new phylogenetic hypothesis. This classification includes new, resurrected, and modified subfamilies within gymnophthalmid and scincid lizards, and boid, colubrid, and lamprophiid snakes.
Authors: Todd A Castoe; A P Jason de Koning; Hyun-Min Kim; Wanjun Gu; Brice P Noonan; Gavin Naylor; Zhi J Jiang; Christopher L Parkinson; David D Pollock Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-04-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Bryan G Fry; Nicolas Vidal; Janette A Norman; Freek J Vonk; Holger Scheib; S F Ryan Ramjan; Sanjaya Kuruppu; Kim Fung; S Blair Hedges; Michael K Richardson; Wayne C Hodgson; Vera Ignjatovic; Robyn Summerhayes; Elazar Kochva Journal: Nature Date: 2005-11-16 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Emma Sherratt; María del Rosario Castañeda; Russell J Garwood; D Luke Mahler; Thomas J Sanger; Anthony Herrel; Kevin de Queiroz; Jonathan B Losos Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-07-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ryan K Schott; Johannes Müller; Clement G Y Yang; Nihar Bhattacharyya; Natalie Chan; Mengshu Xu; James M Morrow; Ana-Hermina Ghenu; Ellis R Loew; Vincent Tropepe; Belinda S W Chang Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-12-29 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Bruno F Simões; Filipa L Sampaio; Ellis R Loew; Kate L Sanders; Robert N Fisher; Nathan S Hart; David M Hunt; Julian C Partridge; David J Gower Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 2016-01-27 Impact factor: 5.349
Authors: Martina Johnson Pokorná; Vladimir A Trifonov; Willem Rens; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Lukáš Kratochvíl Journal: Chromosome Res Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 5.239