Literature DB >> 19000870

Automated detection of breast mass spiculation levels and evaluation of scheme performance.

Luan Jiang1, Enmin Song, Xiangyang Xu, Guangzhi Ma, Bin Zheng.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Although the spiculation levels of breast mass boundaries are a primary sign of malignancy for masses detected on mammography, developing an automated computerized method to detect spiculation levels and quantitatively evaluating the performance of such a method is a difficult task. The objectives of this study were to (1) develop and test a new method to improve mass segmentation and detect mass boundary spiculation levels and (2) assess the performance of this method using a relatively large imaging data set.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The fully automated method developed for this study includes three image-processing steps. In the first step, the principle of maximum entropy is applied in the selected region of interest (ROI) after correcting the background trend to enhance the initial outlines of a mass. In the second step, an active-contour model is used to refine the initial outlines. In the third step, spiculated lines connected to the mass boundary are detected and identified using a special line detector. A quantitative spiculation index is computed to assess the degree of spiculation. To develop and evaluate this automated method, 211 ROIs depicting masses were extracted from a publicly available image database. Among these ROIs, 106 depicted circumscribed mass regions and 105 involved spiculated mass regions. The performance of the method was evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
RESULTS: The computed area under the ROC curve, when applying the method to the data set, was 0.701 +/- 0.027. By setting up a threshold at a spiculation index of 5.0, the method achieved an overall classification accuracy of 66.4%, with 54.3% sensitivity and 78.3% specificity.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a new computerized method with a number of unique characteristics was developed to detect spiculated mass regions, and a simple spiculation index was applied to quantify mass spiculation levels. Although this quantitative index can be used to distinguish between spiculated and circumscribed masses, the results also suggest that the automated detection of mass spiculation levels remains a technical challenge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19000870      PMCID: PMC2857703          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  28 in total

1.  False-positive reduction in CAD mass detection using a competitive classification strategy.

Authors:  L Li; Y Zheng; L Zhang; R A Clark
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Segmentation of suspicious densities in digital mammograms.

Authors:  G M te Brake; N Karssemeijer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.

Authors:  B Sahiner; N Petrick; H P Chan; L M Hadjiiski; C Paramagul; M A Helvie; M N Gurcan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography.

Authors:  Nevine H Eltonsy; Georgia D Tourassi; Adel S Elmaghraby
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Snakes, shapes, and gradient vector flow.

Authors:  C Xu; J L Prince
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 10.856

6.  Automated detection of breast masses on mammograms using adaptive contrast enhancement and texture classification.

Authors:  N Petrick; H P Chan; D Wei; B Sahiner; M A Helvie; D D Adler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A computer-aided detection system for the evaluation of breast cancer by mammographic appearance and lesion size.

Authors:  Rachel F Brem; Jeffrey W Hoffmeister; Gilat Zisman; Martin P DeSimio; Steven K Rogers
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Mammography: reviewing the evidence. Epidemiology aspect.

Authors:  A B Miller
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 9.  Breast cancer screening among women younger than age 50: a current assessment of the issues.

Authors:  R A Smith
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions.

Authors:  W P Kegelmeyer; J M Pruneda; P D Bourland; A Hillis; M W Riggs; M L Nipper
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  4 in total

1.  Association of ultrasonographic features with NGX6 expression and prognosis in invasive ductal breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Jidong Xiao; Yuanquan Zhou; Wenhui Zhu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-06-01

2.  Building an ensemble system for diagnosing masses in mammograms.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Noriko Tomuro; Jacob Furst; Daniela Stan Raicu
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Mammography Using Content-based Image Retrieval Approaches: Current Status and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Bin Zheng
Journal:  Algorithms       Date:  2009-06-01

4.  Optimization of breast mass classification using sequential forward floating selection (SFFS) and a support vector machine (SVM) model.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Jiantao Pu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.924

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.