Literature DB >> 15728614

A computer-aided detection system for the evaluation of breast cancer by mammographic appearance and lesion size.

Rachel F Brem1, Jeffrey W Hoffmeister, Gilat Zisman, Martin P DeSimio, Steven K Rogers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the performance of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system in the detection of breast cancer based on mammographic appearance and lesion size.
CONCLUSION: The CAD system correctly marked most biopsy-proven breast cancers, with a greater sensitivity for microcalcification than for mass lesions but with no significant difference in performance based on cancer size. CAD was highly effective in detecting even the smallest lesions, with a sensitivity of 92% for lesions of 5 mm or less. CAD is a useful tool for the detection of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15728614     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.184.3.01840893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  7 in total

1.  Interactive computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses: computerized selection of visually similar image sets from a reference library.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Claudia Mello-Thoms; Xiao-Hui Wang; Gordon S Abrams; Jules H Sumkin; Denise M Chough; Marie A Ganott; Amy Lu; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Evaluation of breast amorphous calcifications by a computer-aided detection system in full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  A M Scaranelo; R Eiada; K Bukhanov; P Crystal
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Advances in computer-aided diagnosis for breast cancer.

Authors:  Lubomir Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.927

4.  Automated detection of breast mass spiculation levels and evaluation of scheme performance.

Authors:  Luan Jiang; Enmin Song; Xiangyang Xu; Guangzhi Ma; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  CAD May Not be Necessary for Microcalcifications in the Digital era, CAD May Benefit Radiologists for Masses.

Authors:  Stamatia V Destounis; Andrea L Arieno; Renee C Morgan
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2012-07-28

6.  Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions.

Authors:  Fiona J Gilbert; Susan M Astley; Caroline Rm Boggis; Magnus A McGee; Pamela M Griffiths; Stephen W Duffy; Olorunsola F Agbaje; Maureen Gc Gillan; Mary Wilson; Anil K Jain; Nicola Barr; Ursula M Beetles; Miriam A Griffiths; Jill Johnson; Rita M Roberts; Heather E Deans; Karen A Duncan; Geeta Iyengar
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  Mammography to tomosynthesis: examining the differences between two-dimensional and segmented-three-dimensional visual search.

Authors:  Stephen H Adamo; Justin M Ericson; Joseph C Nah; Rachel Brem; Stephen R Mitroff
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-06-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.