Literature DB >> 11075240

Breast cancer screening among women younger than age 50: a current assessment of the issues.

R A Smith1.   

Abstract

In the hope of resolving underlying policy questions related to the value of breast cancer screening with mammography for women younger than 50 years of age, the National Institutes of Health and the National Cancer Institute in 1997 jointly sponsored a consensus conference on the subject. While the panel concluded that the data were insufficient to endorse mammography for this age group apart from individual choice, the conclusion was not the "consensus" sought by many of those with strong opinions on both sides of this issue, and the debate raged on. Prior to the 1997 conference, and since, meta-analyses of trial data and assessments of service screening programs have indicated that breast cancer screening with mammography for women between 40 and 49 meets recommended levels of performance compared with performance in women 50 years and older, especially if programs achieve high quality and screen at 12-to-18 month intervals. Because the detectable preclinical phase is shorter in younger women who develop breast cancer compared with that in women 50 years of age or older, a key component of any screening program for those younger than 50 is an appropriate screening interval. Many of the screening programs that had historically been developed for women in their forties--and whose disappointing results contributed to the confusion and controversy about the efficacy of mammography in younger women--had a 24-month screening interval, which was not found to be of significant benefit for early detection of breast cancer in this age group. While a new emphasis of this controversy has focused on the balance of benefits and harms in women ages 40 to 49, women of all ages need to be fully informed about the benefits and limitations of breast cancer screening--more specifically, what to expect at the time of screening, and what to expect from screening. There are differences in the performance and effectiveness of mammography in different age groups of women aged 40 and older, but these differences are not so great to question the value of screening in any one group. While some questions remain unresolved, the efficacy of mammography in women ages 40 to 49 should no longer be considered controversial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11075240     DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.50.5.312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin        ISSN: 0007-9235            Impact factor:   508.702


  11 in total

1.  A preliminary evaluation of multi-probe resonance-frequency electrical impedance based measurements of the breast.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Dror Lederman; Jules H Sumkin; Margarita L Zuley; Michelle Z Gruss; Linda S Lovy; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  A GMM-based breast cancer risk stratification using a resonance-frequency electrical impedance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Dror Lederman; Bin Zheng; Xingwei Wang; Jules H Sumkin; David Gur
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Detection of breast abnormalities using a prototype resonance electrical impedance spectroscopy system: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Margarita L Zuley; Jules H Sumkin; Victor J Catullo; Gordon S Abrams; Grace Y Rathfon; Denise M Chough; Michelle Z Gruss; David Gur
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Comparison of the screening practices of unaffected noncarriers under 40 and between 40 and 49 in BRCA1/2 families.

Authors:  Christelle Duprez; Véronique Christophe; Isabelle Milhabet; Aurélie Krzeminski; Claude Adenis; Pascaline Berthet; Jean-Philippe Peyrat; Philippe Vennin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Opportunities for public health communication, intervention, and future research on breast cancer in younger women.

Authors:  Natasha Buchanan; Katherine B Roland; Juan L Rodriguez; Jacqueline W Miller; Temeika Fairley
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Automated detection of breast mass spiculation levels and evaluation of scheme performance.

Authors:  Luan Jiang; Enmin Song; Xiangyang Xu; Guangzhi Ma; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Consensus recommendations for advancing breast cancer: risk identification and screening in ethnically diverse younger women.

Authors:  Alexander Stojadinovic; Thomas A Summers; John Eberhardt; Albert Cerussi; Warren Grundfest; Charles M Peterson; Michael Brazaitis; Elizabeth Krupinski; Harold Freeman
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 4.207

8.  Rates of change to a positive result in subsequent screening mammography in Korean women: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Jong-Myon Bae; Sang Yop Shin; Eun Hee Kim; Yoon-Nam Kim; Chung Mo Nam
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2014-12-26

9.  Mean sojourn time of preclinical gastric cancer in Korean men: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Jong-Myon Bae; Sang Yop Shin; Eun Hee Kim
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2014-07-31

10.  The adjunctive digital breast tomosynthesis in diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Tsung-Lung Yang; Huei-Lung Liang; Chen-Pin Chou; Jer-Shyung Huang; Huay-Ben Pan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.