Literature DB >> 18990521

Evaluation of non-linear blending in dual-energy computed tomography.

David R Holmes1, Joel G Fletcher, Anja Apel, James E Huprich, Hassan Siddiki, David M Hough, Bernhard Schmidt, Thomas G Flohr, Richard Robb, Cynthia McCollough, Michael Wittmer, Christian Eusemann.   

Abstract

Dual-energy CT scanning has significant potential for disease identification and classification. However, it dramatically increases the amount of data collected and therefore impacts the clinical workflow. One way to simplify image review is to fuse CT datasets of different tube energies into a unique blended dataset with desirable properties. A non-linear blending method based on a modified sigmoid function was compared to a standard 0.3 linear blending method. The methods were evaluated in both a liver phantom and patient study. The liver phantom contained six syringes of known CT contrast which were placed in a bovine liver. After scanning at multiple tube currents (45, 55, 65, 75, 85, 95, 105, and 115 mAs for the 140-kV tube), the datasets were blended using both methods. A contrast-to-noise (CNR) measure was calculated for each syringe. In addition, all eight scans were normalized using the effective dose and statistically compared. In the patient study, 45 dual-energy CT scans were retrospectively mixed using the 0.3 linear blending and modified sigmoid blending functions. The scans were compared visually by two radiologists. For the 15, 45, and 64 HU syringes, the non-linear blended images exhibited similar CNR to the linear blended images; however, for the 79, 116, and 145 HU syringes, the non-linear blended images consistently had a higher CNR across dose settings. The radiologists qualitatively preferred the non-linear blended images of the phantom. In the patient study, the radiologists preferred non-linear blending in 31 of 45 cases with a strong preference in bowel and liver cases. Non-linear blending of dual energy data can provide an improvement in CNR over linear blending and is accompanied by a visual preference for non-linear blended images. Further study on selection of blending parameters and lesion conspicuity in non-linear blended images is being pursued.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18990521      PMCID: PMC2743374          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  13 in total

1.  Energy dependent reconstruction in X-ray computerized tomography.

Authors:  A Macovski; R E Alvarez; J L Chan; J P Stonestrom; L M Zatz
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 4.589

2.  Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience.

Authors:  Thorsten R C Johnson; Bernhard Krauss; Martin Sedlmair; Michael Grasruck; Herbert Bruder; Dominik Morhard; Christian Fink; Sabine Weckbach; Miriam Lenhard; Bernhard Schmidt; Thomas Flohr; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Hypervascular liver tumors: low tube voltage, high tube current multi-detector row CT for enhanced detection--phantom study.

Authors:  Sebastian T Schindera; Rendon C Nelson; Srinivasan Mukundan; Erik K Paulson; Tracy A Jaffe; Chad M Miller; David M DeLong; Keigo Kawaji; Terry T Yoshizumi; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system.

Authors:  Thomas G Flohr; Cynthia H McCollough; Herbert Bruder; Martin Petersilka; Klaus Gruber; Christoph Süss; Michael Grasruck; Karl Stierstorfer; Bernhard Krauss; Rainer Raupach; Andrew N Primak; Axel Küttner; Stefan Achenbach; Christoph Becker; Andreas Kopp; Bernd M Ohnesorge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12-10       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Energy-selective reconstructions in X-ray computerized tomography.

Authors:  R E Alvarez; A Macovski
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Measurement of effective atomic number and electron density using an EMI scanner.

Authors:  R A Rutherford; B R Pullan; I Isherwood
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  The effect of the kVp level on EMI values. Selective imaging of various materials with different kVp settings.

Authors:  L M Zatz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography). 1. Description of system.

Authors:  G N Hounsfield
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Bone-mineral estimation by computer-assisted transverse axial tomography.

Authors:  I Isherwood; R A Rutherford; B R Pullan; P H Adams
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-10-02       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Quantification of calcium in solitary pulmonary nodules using single- and dual-energy CT.

Authors:  C E Cann; G Gamsu; F A Birnberg; W R Webb
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  24 in total

1.  Virtual monochromatic imaging in dual-source dual-energy CT: radiation dose and image quality.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Jodie A Christner; Shuai Leng; Jia Wang; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Pilot multi-reader study demonstrating potential for dose reduction in dual energy hepatic CT using non-linear blending of mixed kV image datasets.

Authors:  Anja Apel; Joel G Fletcher; Jeff L Fidler; David M Hough; Lifeng Yu; Luis S Guimaraes; Matthias E Bellemann; Cynthia H McCollough; David R Holmes; Christian D Eusemann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Iodine quantification with dual-energy CT: phantom study and preliminary experience with VX2 residual tumour in rabbits after radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Y Li; G Shi; S Wang; S Wang; R Wu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Newer CT applications and their alternatives: what is appropriate in children?

Authors:  R Paul Guillerman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-08-17

5.  Image quality and radiation dose of dual-energy CT of the head and neck compared with a standard 120-kVp acquisition.

Authors:  A M Tawfik; J M Kerl; A A Razek; R W Bauer; N E Nour-Eldin; T J Vogl; M G Mack
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Dual-energy lung perfusion and ventilation CT in children.

Authors:  Hyun Woo Goo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-02-16

Review 7.  Genitourinary applications of dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Terri J Vrtiska; Naoki Takahashi; Joel G Fletcher; Robert P Hartman; Lifeng Yu; Akira Kawashima
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in emergency radiology: basic principles, techniques, and limitations.

Authors:  Shima Aran; Khalid W Shaqdan; Hani H Abujudeh
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-03-28

Review 9.  Extra-abdominal dual-energy CT applications: a comprehensive overview.

Authors:  Giuseppe Cicero; Giorgio Ascenti; Moritz H Albrecht; Alfredo Blandino; Marco Cavallaro; Tommaso D'Angelo; Maria Ludovica Carerj; Thomas J Vogl; Silvio Mazziotti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Non-linear blending of dual-energy CT data improves depiction of late iodine enhancement in chronic myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Julian L Wichmann; Xiaohan Hu; J Matthias Kerl; Boris Schulz; Boris Bodelle; Claudia Frellesen; Thomas Lehnert; Thomas J Vogl; Ralf W Bauer
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.