Literature DB >> 18096533

Hypervascular liver tumors: low tube voltage, high tube current multi-detector row CT for enhanced detection--phantom study.

Sebastian T Schindera1, Rendon C Nelson, Srinivasan Mukundan, Erik K Paulson, Tracy A Jaffe, Chad M Miller, David M DeLong, Keigo Kawaji, Terry T Yoshizumi, Ehsan Samei.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate, for the depiction of simulated hypervascular liver lesions in a phantom, the effect of a low tube voltage, high tube current computed tomographic (CT) technique on image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), lesion conspicuity, and radiation dose.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A custom liver phantom containing 16 cylindric cavities (four cavities each of 3, 5, 8, and 15 mm in diameter) filled with various iodinated solutions to simulate hypervascular liver lesions was scanned with a 64-section multi-detector row CT scanner at 140, 120, 100, and 80 kVp, with corresponding tube current-time product settings at 225, 275, 420, and 675 mAs, respectively. The CNRs for six simulated lesions filled with different iodinated solutions were calculated. A figure of merit (FOM) for each lesion was computed as the ratio of CNR2 to effective dose (ED). Three radiologists independently graded the conspicuity of 16 simulated lesions. An anthropomorphic phantom was scanned to evaluate the ED. Statistical analysis included one-way analysis of variance.
RESULTS: Image noise increased by 45% with the 80-kVp protocol compared with the 140-kVp protocol (P < .001). However, the lowest ED and the highest CNR were achieved with the 80-kVp protocol. The FOM results indicated that at a constant ED, a reduction of tube voltage from 140 to 120, 100, and 80 kVp increased the CNR by factors of at least 1.6, 2.4, and 3.6, respectively (P < .001). At a constant CNR, corresponding reductions in ED were by a factor of 2.5, 5.5, and 12.7, respectively (P < .001). The highest lesion conspicuity was achieved with the 80-kVp protocol.
CONCLUSION: The CNR of simulated hypervascular liver lesions can be substantially increased and the radiation dose reduced by using an 80-kVp, high tube current CT technique. RSNA, 2007

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18096533     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2461070307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  45 in total

1.  Achieving routine submillisievert CT scanning: report from the summit on management of radiation dose in CT.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Guang Hong Chen; Willi Kalender; Shuai Leng; Ehsan Samei; Katsuyuki Taguchi; Ge Wang; Lifeng Yu; Roderic I Pettigrew
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Pilot multi-reader study demonstrating potential for dose reduction in dual energy hepatic CT using non-linear blending of mixed kV image datasets.

Authors:  Anja Apel; Joel G Fletcher; Jeff L Fidler; David M Hough; Lifeng Yu; Luis S Guimaraes; Matthias E Bellemann; Cynthia H McCollough; David R Holmes; Christian D Eusemann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Xin Liu; Shuai Leng; James M Kofler; Juan C Ramirez-Giraldo; Mingliang Qu; Jodie Christner; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2009-10

4.  Evaluation of an iterative model-based reconstruction algorithm for low-tube-voltage (80 kVp) computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Peter B Noël; Thomas Köhler; Alexander A Fingerle; Kevin M Brown; Stanislav Zabic; Daniela Münzel; Bernhard Haller; Thomas Baum; Martin Henninger; Reinhard Meier; Ernst J Rummeny; Martin Dobritz
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-10-09

5.  Spectral CT in patients with small HCC: investigation of image quality and diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Peijie Lv; Xiao Zhu Lin; Kemin Chen; Jianbo Gao
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation using low tube voltage coronary CT angiography with isotonic low-concentration contrast agent.

Authors:  Yuning Pan; Qiuli Huang; Yingchao Zhu; Xinrong Zou; Huimin Chu; Xianfeng Du; Aijing Li; Shizhong Bu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Single- and dual-energy CT of the abdomen: comparison of radiation dose and image quality of 2nd and 3rd generation dual-source CT.

Authors:  Julian L Wichmann; Andrew D Hardie; U Joseph Schoepf; Lloyd M Felmly; Jonathan D Perry; Akos Varga-Szemes; Stefanie Mangold; Damiano Caruso; Christian Canstein; Thomas J Vogl; Carlo N De Cecco
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  High-pitch dual-source CT angiography of the whole aorta without ECG synchronisation: initial experience.

Authors:  Martin Beeres; Boris Schell; Aristidis Mastragelopoulos; Eva Herrmann; Josef Matthias Kerl; Tatjana Gruber-Rouh; Clara Lee; Petra Siebenhandl; Boris Bodelle; Stephan Zangos; Thomas J Vogl; Volkmar Jacobi; Ralf W Bauer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Impact of model-based iterative reconstruction on low-contrast lesion detection and image quality in abdominal CT: a 12-reader-based comparative phantom study with filtered back projection at different tube voltages.

Authors:  André Euler; Bram Stieltjes; Zsolt Szucs-Farkas; Reto Eichenberger; Clemens Reisinger; Anna Hirschmann; Caroline Zaehringer; Achim Kircher; Matthias Streif; Sabine Bucher; David Buergler; Luigia D'Errico; Sebastién Kopp; Markus Wilhelm; Sebastian T Schindera
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Evaluation of non-linear blending in dual-energy computed tomography.

Authors:  David R Holmes; Joel G Fletcher; Anja Apel; James E Huprich; Hassan Siddiki; David M Hough; Bernhard Schmidt; Thomas G Flohr; Richard Robb; Cynthia McCollough; Michael Wittmer; Christian Eusemann
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 3.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.