Literature DB >> 18989689

Intraorbital optic nerve stimulation with penetrating electrodes: in vivo electrophysiology study in rabbits.

Liming Li1, Pengjia Cao, Mingjie Sun, Xinyu Chai, Kaijie Wu, Xun Xu, Xiaoxin Li, Qiushi Ren.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the response properties of the electrically evoked potentials (EEPs) elicited by intraorbital optic nerve stimulation with penetrating electrodes using different stimulus parameters.
METHODS: Visually evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded as a control and for comparative purposes. Teflon-coated tungsten wire electrodes (100 microm core-diameter, 300 microm exposed tip) were inserted intraorbitally into the optic nerve. A charge-balanced biphasic current was delivered to the optic nerve via inserted wire electrodes in 26 anaesthetized rabbits. EEPs were recorded by epidural electrodes placed over the visual cortex. The charge density threshold for eliciting EEPs was determined. Stimulus pulse amplitude, duration, frequency and waveform were varied to study their effects on EEPs. After the experiments, the stimulated optic nerves were examined histologically for examination of implantation position of the stimulating electrode into the optic nerve tissue.
RESULTS: EEPs were successfully elicited by intraorbital optic nerve stimulation with penetrating electrodes. The measured amplitude of the first large positive peak (P1) was smaller and the latency of P1 was shorter compared with VEPs. The measured charge density threshold to elicit EEPs was 21.36 +/- 5.64 microC/cm(2). The amplitude of P1 increased and the latency of P1 decreased with increasing pulse amplitude of fixed duration stimuli. The amplitude of P1 increased with increasing pulse duration of fixed amplitude stimuli. For fixed charge stimuli, the amplitude of P1 decreased and the latency of P1 increased as the pulse duration increased. As frequency of stimuli varied from 1 to 10 Hz, the amplitude of P1 decreased monotonically. Among the different charge-balanced biphasic pulse stimulating waveforms, the symmetrical cathode-first biphasic pulse elicited the largest amplitude of P1.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that intraorbital optic nerve stimulation with different stimulus parameters by penetrating electrodes can evoke cortical responses with different properties. The short-duration symmetrical cathode-first biphasic pulses of current with low frequencies are more efficacious in eliciting electrophysiological responses in the visual cortex than other stimulating waveforms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18989689     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-008-0977-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  46 in total

1.  Retinal prosthesis: an encouraging first decade with major challenges ahead.

Authors:  J F Rizzo; J Wyatt; M Humayun; E de Juan; W Liu; A Chow; R Eckmiller; E Zrenner; T Yagi; G Abrams
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 2.  Will retinal implants restore vision?

Authors:  Eberhart Zrenner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Pattern recognition with the optic nerve visual prosthesis.

Authors:  Claude Veraart; Marie-Chantal Wanet-Defalque; Benoît Gérard; Annick Vanlierde; Jean Delbeke
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.094

Review 4.  Learning retina implants with epiretinal contacts.

Authors:  R Eckmiller
Journal:  Ophthalmic Res       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.892

5.  Electrophysiological and histological studies of chronically implanted intrapapillary microelectrodes in rabbit eyes.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Fang; Hirokazu Sakaguchi; Takashi Fujikado; Makoto Osanai; Yasushi Ikuno; Motohiro Kamei; Masahito Ohji; Tetsuya Yagi; Yasuo Tano
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 6.  The development of subretinal microphotodiodes for replacement of degenerated photoreceptors.

Authors:  E Zrenner; K D Miliczek; V P Gabel; H G Graf; E Guenther; H Haemmerle; B Hoefflinger; K Kohler; W Nisch; M Schubert; A Stett; S Weiss
Journal:  Ophthalmic Res       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.892

7.  Evoked cortical potentials after electrical stimulation of the inner retina in rabbits.

Authors:  P Walter; K Heimann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Subretinal electrical stimulation of the rabbit retina.

Authors:  A Y Chow; V Y Chow
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1997-03-28       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  A method and technical equipment for an acute human trial to evaluate retinal implant technology.

Authors:  Ralf Hornig; Thomas Laube; Peter Walter; Michaela Velikay-Parel; Norbert Bornfeld; Matthias Feucht; Harun Akguel; Gernot Rössler; Nils Alteheld; Dietmar Lütke Notarp; John Wyatt; Gisbert Richard
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Subretinal electrical stimulation of the rabbit retina with acutely implanted electrode arrays.

Authors:  Florian Gekeler; Karin Kobuch; Hartmut Normann Schwahn; Alfred Stett; Kei Shinoda; Eberhart Zrenner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-06-05       Impact factor: 3.117

View more
  5 in total

1.  Properties of electrically evoked potentials activated by optic nerve stimulation with penetrating electrodes of different modes in rabbits.

Authors:  Pengjia Cao; Jingjing Sun; Yan Yan; Yao Chen; Xinyu Chai; Xiaodong Sun; Qiushi Ren; Liming Li
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Penetrating electrode stimulation of the rabbit optic nerve: parameters and effects on evoked cortical potentials.

Authors:  Jingjing Sun; Yao Chen; Xinyu Chai; Qiushi Ren; Liming Li
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Biocompatibility and durability of Teflon-coated platinum-iridium wires implanted in the vitreous cavity.

Authors:  Kentaro Nishida; Hirokazu Sakaguchi; Ping Xie; Yasuo Terasawa; Motoki Ozawa; Motohiro Kamei; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 1.731

4.  neuroBi: A Highly Configurable Neurostimulator for a Retinal Prosthesis and Other Applications.

Authors:  Kyle D Slater; Nicholas C Sinclair; Timothy S Nelson; Peter J Blamey; Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 3.316

5.  Cortical responses elicited by photovoltaic subretinal prostheses exhibit similarities to visually evoked potentials.

Authors:  Yossi Mandel; Georges Goetz; Daniel Lavinsky; Philip Huie; Keith Mathieson; Lele Wang; Theodore Kamins; Ludwig Galambos; Richard Manivanh; James Harris; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.