Literature DB >> 24013577

Penetrating electrode stimulation of the rabbit optic nerve: parameters and effects on evoked cortical potentials.

Jingjing Sun1, Yao Chen, Xinyu Chai, Qiushi Ren, Liming Li.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stimulus parameters, in particular pulse shape, are an important consideration in the application of electrical stimulation when experimentally testing a visual prosthesis. We changed the biphasic pulse shape of several asymmetric charge-balanced pulses to investigate their effect on optic nerve (ON) stimulation and the recorded cortical response.
METHODS: Monopolar platinum-iridium electrodes were implanted into the rabbit's ON behind the eyeball. Electrical evoked potentials (EEPs) were recorded with silver ball electrodes placed on the cortex, and the results quantified.
RESULTS: Our results indicate that changing the shape of cathodic-first charge-balanced biphasic pulse (CA) while maintaining charge balance could reduce the current thresholds for stimulation. When stimulated at the same charge density, the stimulus having high-amplitude short-duration (HASD) cathodic phase produced a higher amplitude response, with a larger spatial spread but with a lower current threshold compared with other stimuli. Adding an inter-phase gap between the two phases of the stimulus increased the EEP amplitude, but was saturated at a gap of ∼0.2 ms; this was most obvious with CA stimulation, which was able to elicit a larger cortical response than that elicited by asymmetrical charge-balanced stimulus pulses with HASD cathodic phase, in contrast to CA without a gap. As the stimulating frequency increased, the amplitudes of the EEP components elicited by CA monotonically decreased. The fastest component (P0) was present with stimulating frequencies as high as 80 Hz, while the slower P1 and P2 disappeared with stimulating frequencies higher than 40 and 20 Hz, respectively.
CONCLUSION: A CA stimulus waveform with an inter-phase gap of 0.2 ms was more efficacious for ON stimulation than other stimulus combinations, and therefore should result in less tissue damage, minimal electrode etching, and lower power consumption if used in a visual prosthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24013577     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-013-2449-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  35 in total

1.  Brief, noninjurious electric waveform for stimulation of the brain.

Authors:  J C LILLY; J R HUGHES; E C ALVORD; T W GALKIN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1955-04-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Pattern recognition with the optic nerve visual prosthesis.

Authors:  Claude Veraart; Marie-Chantal Wanet-Defalque; Benoît Gérard; Annick Vanlierde; Jean Delbeke
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.094

3.  Effects of waveform shape on human sensitivity to electrical stimulation of the inner ear.

Authors:  Astrid van Wieringen; Robert P Carlyon; Johan Laneau; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Intraorbital optic nerve stimulation with penetrating electrodes: in vivo electrophysiology study in rabbits.

Authors:  Liming Li; Pengjia Cao; Mingjie Sun; Xinyu Chai; Kaijie Wu; Xun Xu; Xiaoxin Li; Qiushi Ren
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Selective degeneration of optic nerve fibres in the cat produced by a pressure block.

Authors:  W Burke; L J Cottee; J Garvey; R Kumarasinghe; C Kyriacou
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Asymmetric pulses in cochlear implants: effects of pulse shape, polarity, and rate.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; Astrid van Wieringen; Robert P Carlyon; John M Deeks; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-20

7.  Comparison of electrically evoked cortical potential thresholds generated with subretinal or suprachoroidal placement of a microelectrode array in the rabbit.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Yamauchi; Luisa M Franco; Douglas J Jackson; John F Naber; R Ofer Ziv; Joseph F Rizzo; Henry J Kaplan; Volker Enzmann
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Intraorbital implantation of a stimulating electrode for an optic nerve visual prosthesis. Case report.

Authors:  Mårten E Brelén; Patrick De Potter; Michel Gersdorff; Guy Cosnard; Claude Veraart; Jean Delbeke
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Alternative pulse shapes in electrical hearing.

Authors:  Astrid van Wieringen; Olivier Macherey; Robert P Carlyon; John M Deeks; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words.

Authors:  Eberhart Zrenner; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Heval Benav; Dorothea Besch; Anna Bruckmann; Veit-Peter Gabel; Florian Gekeler; Udo Greppmaier; Alex Harscher; Steffen Kibbel; Johannes Koch; Akos Kusnyerik; Tobias Peters; Katarina Stingl; Helmut Sachs; Alfred Stett; Peter Szurman; Barbara Wilhelm; Robert Wilke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  3 in total

1.  Properties of electrically evoked potentials activated by optic nerve stimulation with penetrating electrodes of different modes in rabbits.

Authors:  Pengjia Cao; Jingjing Sun; Yan Yan; Yao Chen; Xinyu Chai; Xiaodong Sun; Qiushi Ren; Liming Li
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  [Visual prostheses].

Authors:  P Walter
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Visual Interhemispheric and Striate-Extrastriate Cortical Connections in the Rabbit: A Multiple Tracer Study.

Authors:  Adrian K Andelin; David J Bruning; Daniel J Felleman; Jaime F Olavarria
Journal:  Neurol Res Int       Date:  2015-09-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.