Literature DB >> 25265993

Processing scalar implicature: a constraint-based approach.

Judith Degen1, Michael K Tanenhaus.   

Abstract

Three experiments investigated the processing of the implicature associated with some using a "gumball paradigm." On each trial, participants saw an image of a gumball machine with an upper chamber with 13 gumballs and an empty lower chamber. Gumballs then dropped to the lower chamber and participants evaluated statements, such as "You got some of the gumballs." Experiment 1 established that some is less natural for reference to small sets (1, 2, and 3 of the 13 gumballs) and unpartitioned sets (all 13 gumballs) compared to intermediate sets (6-8). Partitive some of was less natural than simple some when used with the unpartitioned set. In Experiment 2, including exact number descriptions lowered naturalness ratings for some with small sets but not for intermediate size sets and the unpartitioned set. In Experiment 3, the naturalness ratings from Experiment 2 predicted response times. The results are interpreted as evidence for a Constraint-Based account of scalar implicature processing and against both two-stage, Literal-First models and pragmatic Default models.
© 2014 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternatives; Pragmatics; Quantifiers; Scalar implicature

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25265993      PMCID: PMC4379146          DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  26 in total

1.  Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation.

Authors:  J C Sedivy; M K Tanenhaus; C G Chambers; G N Carlson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-06-22

2.  Characterizing the time course of an implicature: an evoked potentials study.

Authors:  Ira A Noveck; Andres Posada
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 3.  An alternative view of the mental lexicon.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Elman
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Actions and affordances in syntactic ambiguity resolution.

Authors:  Craig G Chambers; Michael K Tanenhaus; James S Magnuson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Are generalised scalar implicatures generated by default? An on-line investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences.

Authors:  Richard Breheny; Napoleon Katsos; John Williams
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-08-22

6.  Becoming syntactic.

Authors:  Franklin Chang; Gary S Dell; Kathryn Bock
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech.

Authors:  Ann R Bradlow; Tessa Bent
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-05-29

8.  Expectation-based syntactic comprehension.

Authors:  Roger Levy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-07-30

9.  The discrimination of visual number.

Authors:  E L KAUFMAN; M W LORD
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1949-10

10.  When people are more logical under cognitive load: dual task impact on scalar implicature.

Authors:  Wim De Neys; Walter Schaeken
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2007
View more
  20 in total

1.  Neural correlates of fine-grained meaning distinctions: An fMRI investigation of scalar quantifiers.

Authors:  Jiayu Zhan; Xiaoming Jiang; Stephen Politzer-Ahles; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Is it or isn't it: listeners make rapid use of prosody to infer speaker meanings.

Authors:  Chigusa Kurumada; Meredith Brown; Sarah Bibyk; Daniel F Pontillo; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-08-14

3.  Availability of Alternatives and the Processing of Scalar Implicatures: A Visual World Eye-Tracking Study.

Authors:  Judith Degen; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-03-25

4.  Some inferences still take time: Prosody, predictability, and the speed of scalar implicatures.

Authors:  Yi Ting Huang; Jesse Snedeker
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Some Alternatives? Event-Related Potential Investigation of Literal and Pragmatic Interpretations of Some Presented in Isolation.

Authors:  Cécile Barbet; Guillaume Thierry
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-30

6.  Scalar and Ignorance Inferences Are Both Computed Immediately upon Encountering the Sentential Connective: The Online Processing of Sentences with Disjunction Using the Visual World Paradigm.

Authors:  Likan Zhan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-31

7.  Some Differences in Some: Examining Variability in the Interpretation of Scalars Using Latent Class Analysis.

Authors:  Tom Heyman; Walter Schaeken
Journal:  Psychol Belg       Date:  2015-03-13

8.  Reasoning in Reference Games: Individual- vs. Population-Level Probabilistic Modeling.

Authors:  Michael Franke; Judith Degen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Talker-Specific Generalization of Pragmatic Inferences based on Under- and Over-Informative Prenominal Adjective Use.

Authors:  Amanda Pogue; Chigusa Kurumada; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-20

10.  Involvement of prefrontal cortex in scalar implicatures: evidence from magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Stephen Politzer-Ahles; Laura Gwilliams
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.