Literature DB >> 18975048

Is targeted reconstruction necessary for evaluating contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography using a liquid crystal display monitor?

Yoshiyuki Ozawa1, Masaki Hara, Hidekazu Oshima, Masanori Kitase, Kazuya Ohashi, Yuta Shibamoto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine whether 20-cm field-of-view (FOV) targeted reconstruction (TR) on contrast-enhanced (CE) chest computed tomography (CT) might improve the diagnostic value compared with simple zooming (SZ) from whole-thorax FOV images using a 2 million (2M)-pixel liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 44 patients. SZ images were magnified from a FOV of 26-34 cm (mean 29.7 cm). Parameters were 512 x 512 matrix and 3 mm thickness and interval. Images were reconstructed using a soft-tissue kernel. Three radiologists evaluated contour, spiculation, notch, pleural tag, invasion, and internal characteristics of the lesions using 5-scale scores. We also performed a phantom study to evaluate the spatial resolution of images.
RESULTS: The diagnostic value of the TR images was similar to that of the SZ images, with the findings identified in 88%-100% of the cases. Artifacts from high-density structures deteriorated the image quality in six (14%), and the SZ images were judged to be preferable in five of them. In the phantom study, there was little difference in spatial resolution between the two images.
CONCLUSION: The SZ images from whole-thorax FOV on CE chest CT were similar in quality to TR images using a 2M-pixel LCD monitor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18975048     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-008-0260-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Med        ISSN: 0288-2043


  7 in total

1.  Radiologists' productivity in the interpretation of CT scans: a comparison of PACS with conventional film.

Authors:  B I Reiner; E L Siegel; F J Hooper; S Pomerantz; A Dahlke; D Rallis
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Liver and bone window settings for soft-copy interpretation of chest and abdominal CT.

Authors:  S M Pomerantz; C S White; T L Krebs; B Daly; S A Sukumar; F Hooper; E L Siegel
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Accuracy of interpretation of CT scans: comparing PACS monitor displays and hard-copy images.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner; Eliot L Siegel; Frank J Hooper
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  PACS monitors: an evolution of radiologist's viewing techniques.

Authors:  W F Bennett; K K Vaswani; J A Mendiola; D G Spigos
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2002-03-21       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Why and how is soft copy reading possible in clinical practice?

Authors:  T Mertelmeier
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Interpretation of CT scans with PACS image display in stack mode.

Authors:  A G Mathie; N H Strickland
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Acute stroke: improved nonenhanced CT detection--benefits of soft-copy interpretation by using variable window width and center level settings.

Authors:  M H Lev; J Farkas; J J Gemmete; S T Hossain; G J Hunter; W J Koroshetz; R G Gonzalez
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.105

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.