Literature DB >> 10540655

Acute stroke: improved nonenhanced CT detection--benefits of soft-copy interpretation by using variable window width and center level settings.

M H Lev1, J Farkas, J J Gemmete, S T Hossain, G J Hunter, W J Koroshetz, R G Gonzalez.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the use of nonstandard, variable window width and level review settings in computed tomography (CT) without contrast material administration in the detection of acute stroke.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nonenhanced CT was performed in 21 patients with acute (< 6 hours) middle cerebral arterial stroke and nine control patients. Two blinded neuroradiologists rated all scans for presence of parenchymal hypoattenuation. Images were reviewed at a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) workstation, with standard, locally determined center level and window width settings of 20 and 80 HU and with variable soft-copy settings initially centered at a level of 32 HU with a width of 8 HU. Reviewers altered settings to accentuate gray and white matter contrast.
RESULTS: With standard viewing parameters, sensitivity and specificity for stroke detection were 57% and 100%. Sensitivity increased to 71% with variable window width and center level settings, without loss of specificity. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed a significant improvement in accuracy with nonstandard, soft-copy review settings (P = .03, one-tailed z test).
CONCLUSION: In nonehanced CT of the head, detection of ischemic brain parenchyma is facilitated by soft-copy review with variable window width and center level settings to accentuate the contrast between normal and edematous tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10540655     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.213.1.r99oc10150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  56 in total

Review 1.  Advanced imaging application for acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Jeffrey Farkas; Andrew Xavier; Charles J Prestigiacomo
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2004-12

2.  Commentary. CT stroke window settings: an unfortunate misleading misnomer?

Authors:  P J Turner; G Holdsworth
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  CT angiographic source images: flow- or volume-weighted?

Authors:  M Sharma; A J Fox; S Symons; A Jairath; R I Aviv
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Neuroimaging of ischemia and infarction.

Authors:  Erica C Sá de Camargo; Walter J Koroshetz
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2005-04

Review 5.  Imaging of the brain and cerebral vasculature in patients with suspected stroke: advantages and disadvantages of CT and MRI.

Authors:  Chelsea S Kidwell; Amie W Hsia
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 6.  Computed tomography in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Karl-Olof Lövblad; Alison E Baird
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Imaging Biomarkers for Intra-arterial Stroke Therapy.

Authors:  Olvert A Berkhemer; Shervin Kamalian; R Gilberto González; Charles B L M Majoie; Albert J Yoo
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.495

8.  An acute stroke CT imaging algorithm incorporating automated perfusion analysis.

Authors:  Danielle Byrne; John P Walsh; Peter J MacMahon
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2019-02-01

9.  Recent Administration of Iodinated Contrast Renders Core Infarct Estimation Inaccurate Using RAPID Software.

Authors:  A Z Copelan; E R Smith; G T Drocton; K H Narsinh; D Murph; R S Khangura; Z J Hartley; A A Abla; W P Dillon; C F Dowd; R T Higashida; V V Halbach; S W Hetts; D L Cooke; K Keenan; J Nelson; D Mccoy; M Ciano; M R Amans
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 10.  [Neurologic emergencies and multislice computed tomography].

Authors:  L Eftimov; D Morhard; M Reiser; B Ertl-Wagner
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.