Literature DB >> 9122394

Interpretation of CT scans with PACS image display in stack mode.

A G Mathie1, N H Strickland.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare picture archiving and communication system (PACS) image display in so-called stack mode with conventional image display, tile mode, in efficacy of analysis of three-dimensional structure on computed tomographic (CT) scans.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A complex three-dimensional phantom composed of 20 entangled tubes was constructed and scanned. The resultant images were transferred to a PACS for analysis. Five experienced CT radiologists were asked to unravel the tubes by identifying their ends and to perform this task in both stack and tile modes. The time taken and any errors were recorded.
RESULTS: All five radiologists performed considerably faster in stack mode than in tile mode; the speed varied by a factor of 3.2-5.7 times. The results of a paired t test showed this difference to be significant (P = .0002). Furthermore, no mistakes were made in stack mode, while two mistakes were made in tile mode.
CONCLUSION: Stack mode facilitates analysis of three-dimensional structure depicted on CT scans.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9122394     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.203.1.9122394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of the digital revolution: a radiologist perspective.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner; Eliot L Siegel; Khan Siddiqui
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Using Keynote to present radiology images.

Authors:  Brian B Ghoshhajra; Tust Techasith; Garry Choy; Carlos A Rojas; Stuart R Pomerantz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Using a high-speed movie camera to evaluate slice dropping in clinical image interpretation with stack mode viewers.

Authors:  Masahiro Yakami; Akira Yamamoto; Morio Yanagisawa; Hiroyuki Sekiguchi; Takeshi Kubo; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Optimal presentation modes for detecting brain tumor progression.

Authors:  B J Erickson; C P Wood; T J Kaufmann; J W Patriarche; J Mandrekar
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Evaluating interaction techniques for stack mode viewing.

Authors:  M Stella Atkins; Jennifer Fernquist; Arthur E Kirkpatrick; Bruce B Forster
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Digital imaging data on CD-R: a time trap for orthopaedic surgeons in outpatient clinics.

Authors:  Stephanie Juenemann; Carol Hasler; Reinald Brunner
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 1.548

7.  Is targeted reconstruction necessary for evaluating contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography using a liquid crystal display monitor?

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Ozawa; Masaki Hara; Hidekazu Oshima; Masanori Kitase; Kazuya Ohashi; Yuta Shibamoto
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2008-10-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.