Literature DB >> 18974984

The effect of test TMS intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition in different excitability states.

M I Garry1, R H S Thomson.   

Abstract

The paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) paradigm is increasingly employed to examine intracortical inhibitory processes in different motor tasks. Short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) has been shown to vary with the size of the MEP elicited by the test TMS pulse. This suggests that factors that alter MEP size, such as changes in cortical excitability, may confound the interpretation of SICI. However, the effect of excitability on SICI has not been systematically investigated. The present study examined SICI in 11 volunteers. The effect of test TMS intensities ranging from 90 to 150% resting motor threshold (RMT) on SICI was examined in three excitability states in the right first dorsal interosseous muscle: rest, isometric abduction of the left index finger (Contra) and isometric abduction of the right index finger (Active). For all excitability states SICI was not observed when test TMS intensity was less than 110% resting motor threshold. This was true even for the Active condition in which 90 and 100% test TMS intensities elicited large and consistent MEPs. For all conditions moderately suprathreshold test TMS intensities (110-120% RMT) yielded the greatest measure of SICI; increasing test TMS intensities resulted in a progressive reduction in the estimate of SICI. These results suggest that estimates of SICI are systematically affected by the intensity of the test TMS pulse, regardless of excitability state. The results suggest that SICI should be examined using a constant test TMS intensity regardless of changes in cortical excitability and test MEP size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18974984     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1620-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  26 in total

1.  Direct demonstration of the effect of lorazepam on the excitability of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; A Oliviero; M Meglio; B Cioni; G Tamburrini; P Tonali; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Interactions between two different inhibitory systems in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  T D Sanger; R R Garg; R Chen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Two phases of short-interval intracortical inhibition.

Authors:  Lailoma Roshan; Guillermo O Paradiso; Robert Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The effect of sensory input and attention on the sensorimotor organization of the hand area of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Karin Rosenkranz; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Short-interval cortical inhibition and corticomotor excitability with fatiguing hand exercise: a central adaptation to fatigue?

Authors:  Nicola M Benwell; Paul Sacco; Geoff R Hammond; Michelle L Byrnes; Frank L Mastaglia; Gary W Thickbroom
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Attentional influences on short-interval intracortical inhibition.

Authors:  Richard H S Thomson; Michael I Garry; Jeffery J Summers
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Intracortical inhibition during volitional inhibition of prepared action.

Authors:  James P Coxon; Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Intracortical inhibition and facilitation in different representations of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  R Chen; A Tam; C Bütefisch; B Corwell; U Ziemann; J C Rothwell; L G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Further evidence for excitability changes in human primary motor cortex during ipsilateral voluntary contractions.

Authors:  Nan Liang; Tsuneji Murakami; Kozo Funase; Tomohiro Narita; Tatsuya Kasai
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Different modulation of the cortical silent period by two phases of short interval intracortical inhibition.

Authors:  Suk Yun Kang; Hae-Won Shin; Young Ho Sohn
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 2.759

View more
  34 in total

1.  Unilateral contractions modulate interhemispheric inhibition most strongly and most adaptively in the homologous muscle of the contralateral limb.

Authors:  Mark R Hinder; Matthew W Schmidt; Michael I Garry; Jeffery J Summers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Hemispheric differences in use-dependent corticomotor plasticity in young and old adults.

Authors:  John Cirillo; Nigel C Rogasch; John G Semmler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Assessment of corticospinal excitability after traumatic spinal cord injury using MEP recruitment curves: a preliminary TMS study.

Authors:  R Nardone; Y Höller; A Thomschewski; A C Bathke; A R Ellis; S M Golaszewski; F Brigo; E Trinka
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Corticospinal modulation induced by sounds depends on action preparedness.

Authors:  Welber Marinovic; James R Tresilian; Aymar de Rugy; Simranjit Sidhu; Stephan Riek
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  The effect of ballistic thumb contractions on the excitability of the ipsilateral motor cortex.

Authors:  Mark R Hinder; Matthew W Schmidt; Michael I Garry; Jeffery J Summers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Alterations in the cortical control of standing posture during varying levels of postural threat and task difficulty.

Authors:  Craig D Tokuno; Martin Keller; Mark G Carpenter; Gonzalo Márquez; Wolfgang Taube
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Cortical effects of repetitive finger flexion- vs. extension-resisted tracking movements: a TMS study.

Authors:  Sasha B Godfrey; Peter S Lum; Evan Chan; Michelle L Harris-Love
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Test-retest reliability of short-interval intracortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation in patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Xiaoming Du; L Elliot Hong
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.222

9.  Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition.

Authors:  Michael D Guthrie; Donald L Gilbert; David A Huddleston; Ernest V Pedapati; Paul S Horn; Stewart H Mostofsky; Steve W Wu
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Cortical disinhibition occurs in chronic neuropathic, but not in chronic nociceptive pain.

Authors:  Peter Schwenkreis; Andrea Scherens; Anne-Kathrin Rönnau; Oliver Höffken; Martin Tegenthoff; Christoph Maier
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.