Literature DB >> 29790833

Alterations in the cortical control of standing posture during varying levels of postural threat and task difficulty.

Craig D Tokuno1, Martin Keller2,3, Mark G Carpenter4, Gonzalo Márquez5, Wolfgang Taube2.   

Abstract

Cortical excitability increases during the performance of more difficult postural tasks. However, it is possible that changes in postural threat associated with more difficult tasks may in themselves lead to alterations in the neural strategies underlying postural control. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine whether changes in postural threat are responsible for the alterations in corticospinal excitability and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) that occur with increasing postural task difficulty. Fourteen adults completed three postural tasks (supported standing, free standing, or standing on an unstable board) at two surface heights (ground level or 3 m above ground). Single- and paired-pulse magnetic stimuli were applied to the motor cortex to compare soleus (SOL) and tibialis anterior (TA) test motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and SICI between conditions. SOL and TA test MEPs increased from 0.35 ± 0.29 to 0.82 ± 0.41 mV (SOL) and from 0.64 ± 0.51 to 1.96 ± 1.45 mV (TA), respectively, whereas SICI decreased from 52.4 ± 17.2% to 39.6 ± 15.4% (SOL) and from 71.3 ± 17.7% to 50.3 ± 19.9% (TA) with increasing task difficulty. In contrast to the effects of task difficulty, only SOL test MEPs were smaller when participants stood at high (0.49 ± 0.29 mV) compared with low height (0.61 ± 0.40 mV). Because the presence of postural threat did not lead to any additional changes in the excitability of the motor corticospinal pathway and intracortical inhibition with increasing task difficulty, it seems unlikely that alterations in perceived threat are primarily responsible for the neurophysiological changes that are observed with increasing postural task difficulty. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We examined how task difficulty and postural threat influence the cortical control of posture. Results indicated that the motor corticospinal pathway and intracortical inhibition were modulated more by task difficulty than postural threat. Furthermore, because the presence of postural threat during the performance of various postural tasks did not lead to summative changes in motor-evoked potentials, alterations in perceived threat are not responsible for the neurophysiological changes that occur with increasing postural task difficulty.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arousal; balance control; electromyography; postural threat; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29790833      PMCID: PMC6171069          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00709.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  29 in total

1.  The influence of postural threat on the control of upright stance.

Authors:  M G Carpenter; J S Frank; C P Silcher; G W Peysar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Postural control is scaled to level of postural threat.

Authors:  A L Adkin; J S Frank; M G Carpenter; G W Peysar
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Human H-reflexes are smaller in difficult beam walking than in normal treadmill walking.

Authors:  M Llewellyn; J F Yang; A Prochazka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Multiple EMG activity and intracortical inhibition and facilitation during a fine finger movement under pressure.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Tanaka; Kozo Funase; Hiroshi Sekiya; Joyo Sasaki; Toru Takemoto
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  The effect of test TMS intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition in different excitability states.

Authors:  M I Garry; R H S Thomson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Posture-related modulation of cortical excitability in the tibialis anterior muscle in humans.

Authors:  Hiroki Obata; Hirofumi Sekiguchi; Tatsuyuki Ohtsuki; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 7.  Threat assessment and locomotion: clinical applications of an integrated model of anxiety and postural control.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Staab; Carey D Balaban; Joseph M Furman
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 3.420

8.  Behavioral inhibition system sensitivity enhances motor cortex suppression when watching fearful body expressions.

Authors:  Sara Borgomaneri; Francesca Vitale; Alessio Avenanti
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.270

9.  Effects of antiepileptic drugs on motor cortex excitability in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  U Ziemann; S Lönnecker; B J Steinhoff; W Paulus
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  The relationship between fear of falling and human postural control.

Authors:  Justin R Davis; Adam D Campbell; Allan L Adkin; Mark G Carpenter
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 2.840

View more
  2 in total

1.  Increased human stretch reflex dynamic sensitivity with height-induced postural threat.

Authors:  Brian C Horslen; Martin Zaback; J Timothy Inglis; Jean-Sébastien Blouin; Mark G Carpenter
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Standing Neurophysiological Assessment of Lower Extremity Muscles Post-Stroke.

Authors:  John Harvey Kindred; Christian Finetto; Jasmine Jamilah Cash; Mark Goodman Bowden
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 1.355

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.