Literature DB >> 9862891

Intracortical inhibition and facilitation in different representations of the human motor cortex.

R Chen1, A Tam, C Bütefisch, B Corwell, U Ziemann, J C Rothwell, L G Cohen.   

Abstract

Intracortical inhibition and facilitation in different representations of the human motor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 2870-2881, 1998. Intracortical inhibition (ICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) of the human motor cortex can be studied with paired transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Plastic changes and some neurological disorders in humans are associated with changes in ICI and ICF. Although well characterized in the hand representation, it is not known if ICI and ICF vary across different body part representations. Therefore we studied ICI and ICF in different motor representations of the human motor cortex. The target muscles were rectus abdominus (RA), biceps brachii (BB), abductor pollicis brevis (APB), quadriceps femoris (QF), and abductor hallucis (AH). For each muscle, we measured the rest and active motor thresholds (MTs), the motor-evoked potential (MEP) stimulus-response curve (MEP recruitment), ICI, and ICF. The effects of different interstimulus intervals (ISIs) were studied with a conditioning stimulus (CS) intensity of 80% active MT. The effects of different CS intensities were studied at ISI of 2 ms for ICI and ISI of 15 ms for ICF. MT was lowest for APB, followed by BB, AH, and QF, and was highest for RA. Except for BB, MEP recruitment was generally steeper for muscles with lower MT. ICI and ICF were present in all the motor representations tested. The stimulus intensity necessary to elicit ICI was consistently lower than that required to elicit ICF, suggesting that they are mediated by separate mechanisms. Despite wide differences in MT and MEP recruitment, the absolute CS intensities (expressed as percentage of the stimulator's output) required to elicit ICI and ICF appear unrelated to MT and MEP recruitment in the different muscles tested. These findings suggest that the intracortical mechanisms for inhibition and facilitation in different motor representations are not related to the strength of corticospinal projections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9862891     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.6.2870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  136 in total

1.  Interactions between two different inhibitory systems in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  T D Sanger; R R Garg; R Chen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Effects of peripheral sensory input on cortical inhibition in humans.

Authors:  Alexandra Sailer; Gregory F Molnar; Danny I Cunic; Robert Chen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Inhibition of the cortex using transcranial magnetic stimulation in psychiatric populations: current and future directions.

Authors:  Natasha Radhu; Lakshmi N Ravindran; Andrea J Levinson; Zafiris J Daskalakis
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 4.  Interactions between inhibitory and excitatory circuits in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Robert Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The mechanisms of interhemispheric inhibition in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Zafiris J Daskalakis; Bruce K Christensen; Paul B Fitzgerald; Lailoma Roshan; Robert Chen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Two phases of short-interval intracortical inhibition.

Authors:  Lailoma Roshan; Guillermo O Paradiso; Robert Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Further evidence to support different mechanisms underlying intracortical inhibition of the motor cortex.

Authors:  Ritsuko Hanajima; Toshiaki Furubayashi; Nobue Kobayashi Iwata; Yasushi Shiio; Shingo Okabe; Ichiro Kanazawa; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Effect of antipsychotics on cortical inhibition using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Zafiris J Daskalakis; Bruce K Christensen; Robert Chen; Paul B Fitzgerald; Robert B Zipursky; Shitij Kapur
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 9.  The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation to evaluate cortical excitability of lower limb musculature: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Trisha M Kesar; James W Stinear; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.406

10.  Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition.

Authors:  Michael D Guthrie; Donald L Gilbert; David A Huddleston; Ernest V Pedapati; Paul S Horn; Stewart H Mostofsky; Steve W Wu
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.