Literature DB >> 23175798

Cortical effects of repetitive finger flexion- vs. extension-resisted tracking movements: a TMS study.

Sasha B Godfrey1, Peter S Lum, Evan Chan, Michelle L Harris-Love.   

Abstract

While the cortical effects of repetitive motor activity are generally believed to be task specific, the task parameters that modulate these effects are incompletely understood. Since there are differences in the neural control of flexor vs. extensor muscles, the type of muscles involved in the motor task of interest may be one important parameter. In addition, the role each muscle plays in the task, such as whether or not it is the prime mover, is another potentially important task parameter. In the present study, use-dependent cortical plasticity was examined in healthy volunteers performing a robotic waveform tracking task with either the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) or flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) acting as the prime mover. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to measure corticospinal excitability (CE) and short-interval intracortical inhibition of lower and higher threshold corticospinal neurons (SICI(L) and SICI(H), respectively) before and after a flexion- or extension-resisted finger tracking task. After repetitive performance of the tracking task, there was a significant decrease in SICI(L) targeting the EDC, while no change in CE targeting EDC was observed. In contrast, the reverse pattern was observed in the FDS: a significant increase in CE with no change in SICI(L). There was also a tendency toward increased SICI(H) targeting whichever muscle was acting as the prime mover, although this effect did not reach statistical significance. We conclude that there is a difference in patterns of use-dependent plasticity between extrinsic finger flexor and extensor muscles performing the same task.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23175798      PMCID: PMC3569125          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00143.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  40 in total

1.  Role of the human motor cortex in rapid motor learning.

Authors:  W Muellbacher; U Ziemann; B Boroojerdi; L Cohen; M Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Modulation of practice-dependent plasticity in human motor cortex.

Authors:  U Ziemann; W Muellbacher; M Hallett; L G Cohen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Hemispheric differences in the relationship between corticomotor excitability changes following a fine-motor task and motor learning.

Authors:  Michael I Garry; Gary Kamen; Michael A Nordstrom
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The mechanisms of interhemispheric inhibition in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Zafiris J Daskalakis; Bruce K Christensen; Paul B Fitzgerald; Lailoma Roshan; Robert Chen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Properties of primary motor cortex output to forelimb muscles in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Michael C Park; Abderraouf Belhaj-Saïf; Paul D Cheney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Optimal focal transcranial magnetic activation of the human motor cortex: effects of coil orientation, shape of the induced current pulse, and stimulus intensity.

Authors:  J P Brasil-Neto; L G Cohen; M Panizza; J Nilsson; B J Roth; M Hallett
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.177

7.  Corticospinal projections to upper limb motoneurones in humans.

Authors:  E Palmer; P Ashby
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex.

Authors:  T Kujirai; M D Caramia; J C Rothwell; B L Day; P D Thompson; A Ferbert; S Wroe; P Asselman; C D Marsden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Excitability changes in resting forearm muscles during voluntary foot movements depend on hand position: a neural substrate for hand-foot isodirectional coupling.

Authors:  Paola Borroni; Gabriella Cerri; Fausto Baldissera
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Mechanisms of use-dependent plasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  C M Bütefisch; B C Davis; S P Wise; L Sawaki; L Kopylev; J Classen; L G Cohen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  6 in total

1.  Differential plasticity of extensor and flexor motor cortex representations following visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  L Quinn; A Miljevic; B K Rurak; W Marinovic; Ann-Maree Vallence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Improvements in hand function in adults with chronic tetraplegia following a multiday 10-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation intervention combined with repetitive task practice.

Authors:  Joyce Gomes-Osman; Edelle C Field-Fote
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.649

3.  A complementary role of intracortical inhibition in age-related tactile degradation and its remodelling in humans.

Authors:  Burkhard Pleger; Claudia Wilimzig; Volkmar Nicolas; Tobias Kalisch; Patrick Ragert; Martin Tegenthoff; Hubert R Dinse
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Spatial and Temporal Arrangement of Recurrent Inhibition in the Primate Upper Limb.

Authors:  Steve A Edgley; Elizabeth R Williams; Stuart N Baker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation With Gamma Oscillations Over the Primary Motor Cortex and Cerebellar Hemisphere Improved Visuomotor Performance.

Authors:  Shota Miyaguchi; Naofumi Otsuru; Sho Kojima; Kei Saito; Yasuto Inukai; Mitsuhiro Masaki; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  A hierarchy of corticospinal plasticity in human hand and forearm muscles.

Authors:  K M Riashad Foysal; Stuart N Baker
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 5.182

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.