Literature DB >> 18974929

Experimental contamination of a closed endotracheal suction system: 24 h vs 72 h.

E Meyer1, M Schuhmacher, W Ebner, M Dettenkofer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the desirability of replacing closed suction systems after 72 h rather than after 24 h (manufacturer's recommendations) because it is possible that a reduction in the frequency of manipulations might reduce the risk of exogenous nosocomial pneumonia. We investigated the presence of time-dependent differences (after 24 h and 72 h) in pathogen survival/growth in artificially contaminated closed suction catheters (OptiFlo).
DESIGN: The trial simulated bacterial contamination of the airways using a suspension of 2 x 10(3) CFU/ml of Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Contamination was performed on a total of 80 catheters. Forty were contaminated a total of eight times every 45-60 min. Another 40 catheters underwent the same procedure 24 times over three consecutive days. Microbiological analysis of the catheters took place after 24 h and 72 h, respectively.
RESULTS: The mean S. aureus load was 9.4 CFU/catheter after eight suction procedures and 6.2 CFU/catheter after 24 suction procedures (3 days). Mean growth of P. aeruginosa was 5.3 CFU/catheter, and 8.2 CFU/catheter after 3 days. There was no statistically significant difference between day 1 and 3 for S. aureus (p = 0.474), but there was for P. aeruginosa (p = 0.004).
CONCLUSION: Our findings show that, from an experimental point of view, it remains controversial whether routine change of closed suction catheters can be extended from 24 h to 72 h. However, clinical evidence suggests that prolonged use of a closed suctioning system is safe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18974929     DOI: 10.1007/s15010-008-7444-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


  11 in total

1.  Mechanical ventilation with or without daily changes of in-line suction catheters.

Authors:  M H Kollef; D Prentice; S D Shapiro; V J Fraser; P Silver; E Trovillion; P Weilitz; B von Harz; R St John
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Weekly versus daily changes of in-line suction catheters: impact on rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia and associated costs.

Authors:  James K Stoller; Douglas K Orens; Cynthia Fatica; Morgan Elliott; Lucy Kester; Jeff Woods; Lori Hoffman-Hogg; Matthew T Karafa; Alejandro C Arroliga
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.258

Review 3.  Closed tracheal suction systems versus open tracheal suction systems for mechanically ventilated adult patients.

Authors:  M Subirana; I Solà; S Benito
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17

4.  Nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients, a prospective randomised evaluation of the Stericath closed suctioning system.

Authors:  P Combes; B Fauvage; C Oleyer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Comparison of a closed (Trach Care MAC) with an open endotracheal suction system in small premature infants.

Authors:  L Cordero; M Sananes; L W Ayers
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2000 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.521

6.  Impact of the suctioning system (open vs. closed) on the incidence of ventilation-associated pneumonia: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ralf-Peter Vonberg; Tim Eckmanns; Tobias Welte; Petra Gastmeier
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Prolonged application of closed in-line suction catheters increases microbial colonization of the lower respiratory tract and bacterial growth on catheter surface.

Authors:  C C Freytag; F L Thies; W König; T Welte
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.553

8.  Closed suctioning system reduces cross-contamination between bronchial system and gastric juices.

Authors:  Werner Rabitsch; Wolfgang J Köstler; Wolfgang Fiebiger; Christoph Dielacher; Heidrun Losert; Camillo Sherif; Thomas Staudinger; Edith Seper; Walter Koller; Florian Daxböck; Ernst Schuster; Paul Knöbl; Heinz Burgmann; Michael Frass
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Tracheal suction by closed system without daily change versus open system.

Authors:  Leonardo Lorente; María Lecuona; Alejandro Jiménez; María L Mora; Antonio Sierra
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Guidelines for preventing health-care--associated pneumonia, 2003: recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.

Authors:  Ofelia C Tablan; Larry J Anderson; Richard Besser; Carolyn Bridges; Rana Hajjeh
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2004-03-26
View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparing the effect of open and closed endotracheal suctioning on pain and oxygenation in post CABG patients under mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Ali Mohammadpour; Shahram Amini; Mohammad Taghi Shakeri; Sahereh Mirzaei
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.